Sometimes I feel like I am living in the dark when producers like this, who are quite literally in my back yard, go by unnoticed. Mount Eden Vineyards is an icon in the Santa Cruz Mountains appellation and has been producing wine here since 1945 yet here I am having my first bottle of wine from them. I picked this up on a recommendation from my local shop and instead of going for one of the $70 or $80+ bottles from a better vintage, I went with this bottle from 2000, which was arguably a pretty bad vintage in comparison to the rest of the last 15 or 20 years in the Santa Cruz Mountains. This allowed me to spend less money on a producer I hadn't tried before and give me an idea of what their wine was like in an off vintage. If you can do good with a bad vintage then you should be able to do great things in a good year right? This wine definitely surprised me and was great right out of the bottle with bright fruit on the nose featuring currants and crushed black cherries mixed with some tobacco and a slight herbal element. The wine is very smooth and quite well structured. I could ask for a little more from the finish, which was brief, and there isn't much left in the way of tannins but for the vintage, I think this is great stuff.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
(Mount Eden Vineyards, Estate Cabernet Sauvignon, San Francisco Bay, Santa Cruz Mountains, California, USA, Red) Login and subscribe to see review text.
9/22/2008 - Rob MacKay wrote: 90 Points
Sometimes I feel like I am living in the dark when producers like this, who are quite literally in my back yard, go by unnoticed. Mount Eden Vineyards is an icon in the Santa Cruz Mountains appellation and has been producing wine here since 1945 yet here I am having my first bottle of wine from them. I picked this up on a recommendation from my local shop and instead of going for one of the $70 or $80+ bottles from a better vintage, I went with this bottle from 2000, which was arguably a pretty bad vintage in comparison to the rest of the last 15 or 20 years in the Santa Cruz Mountains. This allowed me to spend less money on a producer I hadn't tried before and give me an idea of what their wine was like in an off vintage. If you can do good with a bad vintage then you should be able to do great things in a good year right? This wine definitely surprised me and was great right out of the bottle with bright fruit on the nose featuring currants and crushed black cherries mixed with some tobacco and a slight herbal element. The wine is very smooth and quite well structured. I could ask for a little more from the finish, which was brief, and there isn't much left in the way of tannins but for the vintage, I think this is great stuff.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
12/3/2007 - JeffFaust wrote: 84 Points
Black-purple. Nose of oak and vanilla, but no fruit. On the palate, more oak. Well balanced acidity and tannins. Shortish finish.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
10/16/2007 - SantaFeTopher wrote: 89 Points
Better than I expected. Just opening up at this point. Balanced, good varietal nose. Maybe a bit green still.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment