CinCin Restaurant
Tasted Monday, May 28, 2012 by godx with 1,265 views
This was a fantastic tasting. A few general comments: I found the 88s to be my least favorite overall. While some show classic claret notes and can be quite nice, some are starting show lean and mean at this point. The 89s seem to be my favorite as they have the fruit of the 90s, but with just a tad more restraint and more classic structure. The 90s are more showy right now, and probably always will be, and therefore seem to be giving more hedonistic pleasure right now than the 89s...but the 89s need the most time and have a lot left to show.
I found I preferred the Pichon Baron over the Lynch Bages in every vintage. The LBs are easier to like, but ultimately the PBs are better, deeper and more complex across these three vintages. Outside of the killer 1990 Lafite, the PBs were definitely my favorite and they trumped the Moutons in convincing fashion.
With duck rillette, haricot vert and grainy Dijon mustard...
With saddle of rabbit wrapped in prosciutto and sage with hedgehog mushrooms, ricotta gnudi and ramps...
With braised boneless beef shortrib, soft polenta and broccolini...
With apple/caramel sable and seasonal berries...
1988 Château Lynch-Bages 87 Points
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Pauillac
Medium red, some bricking. This had a classic Lynch-Bages with mature red fruits, menthol and cedar. On the palate this wasn’t as impressive as it was light in the mouth with cool flavours of mature red fruits and pencil shavings. Fades quickly on the finish. Pencil shavings, mature red fruits. A few at the table thought this was elegant on the palate, but I was thinking more along the lines of thin and dilute. The nose was actually quite nice…too bad the palate didn’t live up to it. Drink now. Good.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
1989 Château Lynch-Bages 92 Points
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Pauillac
Medium red, some bricking. This was singing on the nose when I opened it at home but by the time we got to it (hour or so later) it seems less expressive (maybe because it’s now sitting beside the extremely expressive ’90). At any rate, nose offers notes of cedar, pencil lead, darker fruits and some Bordeaux funk. These characters carry onto the palate but the flavours are much more intense than the aromas are on the nose. There is a lot of structure here (most structured of the LB trio) with great acidity and solid tannins. This is full and round in the mouth and very well balanced. Dark, almost black fruits linger on the finish. This is still quite youthful and I’ll hold my remaining bottle for a least 5 years. Excellent. 92+
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
1990 Château Lynch-Bages 92 Points
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Pauillac
Slightly more youthful looking than the ’89. This had the most expressive nose of the flight with loads of cedar, Bordeaux funk, dark fruits, bell pepper and tobacco. This also takes the cake for the sweetest fruit and most supple and round mouthfeel. There’s a good deal of structure here, but the ripe and sweet nature of the tannins almost fools you into thinking there’s none. Flavours are intense, sweet and refined compared to the ‘89s more tannic and structured profile. Ample acidity keeps the round mouthfeel from being sluggish and there’s a hint of alcohol on the finish that reminds you of the hot year that 1990 was. This had the best nose of the flight; the ’89 had the best palate of the flight. Like the ’89, this should continue to develop for at least 5+ years, but this won’t be as long lived as the ’89. Excellent. 92+
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
1989 Château Prieuré-Lichine 85 Points
France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Margaux
Kind of a modern nose with plenty of okay notes coming through, darker fruits and hints of funk. Not as expressive or classic as the Lynch Bages wines. This was also the most resolved on the palate with powdery tannins and good acidity. This is fully mature. Good.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue