| Wine Type | Vintage Name Variety Locale | Date Posted Score Helpful Comments More... |
|---|---|---|
| White |
2007 3 Blind Moose Cellars RieslingColumbia Valley more |
2/20/2010 - tommers207@gmail.com wrote: 86 pointsDecent low cost riesling. A touch of citrus with some sweetness. Not too much acid. While not the best riesling I've had ths is serviceable. |
| Red |
2006 3 Blind Moose Cellars MerlotCalifornia more |
6/8/2009 - engelshy wrote: 85 pointssteal for 5 bucks |
| Red |
2006 3 Blind Moose Cellars MerlotCalifornia more |
4/27/2009 - jspeacock1978 wrote: NRDecent merlot that needed time to breath. Nice fruit. |
| Red |
2006 3 Blind Moose Cellars Cabernet SauvignonCalifornia more |
4/10/2009 - Kirk Grant wrote: 77 pointsStarting a "new" tasting group (slave2thevine's house): I have to say that just because it's red and alcoholic doesn't mean that it should be able to recieve the label of 'red wine'. This was the least enjoyable red of the night for me. It had a burnt rubber/trash aspect on the nose that was detracting from what little fruit could be noticed. In the mouth it was light, and astringent on the finish...which was almost non-existant. I do not see how they could keep selling their product if this is what it tastes like every year... |
| White |
2007 3 Blind Moose Cellars Pinot GrigioCalifornia more |
3/25/2009 - csu.viticulture wrote: 85 pointsLight vanilla, honey, floral (honeysuckle), and baked apple aromas make this a lot more complex and balanced than I expected from a sub $10 Pinot Grigio. The palate has medium-bodied apple and citrus notes with a clean, citrusy finish. |
| Red |
2006 3 Blind Moose Cellars MerlotCalifornia more |
3/6/2009 - BrandrB wrote: 84 pointsSurprisingly good! Nice Merlot nose. Fruit-forward medium-bodied palate with cherry, chocolate, and oak flavors. Slightly thin on the short finish. Very nice QPR – this drinks like a $15 Merlot for half the price. Not bad at all considering the name, label and price all help to set low initial expectations. |
| Red |
2005 3 Blind Moose Cellars Cabernet SauvignonCalifornia more |
8/29/2008 - joshwoodward wrote: 83 pointsRed fruit, simple, acid, medium tannin, chocolate, light-medium body, light color. Boring. |
| Red |
2005 3 Blind Moose Cellars MerlotCalifornia more |
8/29/2008 - joshwoodward wrote: 87 pointsSurprisingly drinkable! Simple, light body, medium acid, roundish, dark and red fruit, dusty. Chocolate. |
| White |
2007 3 Blind Moose Cellars Pinot GrigioCalifornia more |
8/29/2008 - joshwoodward wrote: 87 pointsButterball. Very rich and round, light acid. Fairly oaky. Bland. Vanilla. Not Italian-style. |
| White |
2007 3 Blind Moose Cellars RieslingColumbia Valley more |
8/29/2008 - joshwoodward wrote: 87 pointsFairly sweet, good acid, lemon, red apple, balanced. Decent value. Light effervescent. Pear. |
| Red |
2006 3 Blind Moose Cellars MerlotCalifornia more |
1/22/2009 - rhps00 wrote: 87 pointsPretty classic merlot. The nose is a little one-note but it has a lot of that note - cherries! Popped and tasted, then passed through my venturi (thanks Bdbrutus!) and feel that this needs a good hour of decant time. Good amount of oak for my palate but not too much. Tannis are firm. The finish is a little short for a merlot but the mouthfeel is solid. More cherries and red fruit on the palate. |
| White |
2005 3 Blind Moose Cellars ChardonnayCalifornia more |
1/21/2009 - Crystal wrote: 90 pointsMellow buttery for a very inexpensive wine.....this was the last 2005 bottle and i wish i had a few more. this Chardonay holds time. |
| Red |
2006 3 Blind Moose Cellars MerlotCalifornia more |
1/3/2009 - matthewjhale wrote: NRThis wine is all over the place and not in a good way. The nose kept changing from plastic to berry to smokey. It started off kind of weak and watery on the palate and with time got a little bit stronger but not with great flavor. It really reminded me of a spoiled bottle but it wasn't consistantly bad so I'm not sure. I'm not going to score this bottle because I'm not sure it would be fair. |
| White |
2006 3 Blind Moose Cellars ChardonnayCalifornia more |
12/27/2008 - petitblanc wrote: 80 pointsQuite pleasant Chardonnay nose, leaning toward tropical fruits. On the palate this turned thin, somewhat harsh and unpleasant. |
| Red |
2006 3 Blind Moose Cellars Cabernet SauvignonCalifornia more |
11/22/2008 - jmoskow wrote: 80 pointsCheap, easy drinking red. Not much here to like or dislike. Some berry notes and cocoa. |
| Red |
2004 3 Blind Moose Cellars Cabernet SauvignonCalifornia more |
11/2/2008 - John Nezlek wrote: 86 pointsGiven other comments, I brought my bottle of this wine to a large Halloween party (plop a bottle on the kitchen counter). Eventually, I had a glass, and I did not find it nearly as repulsive as some of our colleagues did. Admittedly, it was late, and I had sampled a few wines before this wine, but it seemed decent enough. I am not certain that i will buy more (I am trying to drink less, but drink better), but I did find it to be swill. Perhaps the extra time in the bottle mattered -- it is possible> |
| Red |
2005 3 Blind Moose Cellars Cabernet SauvignonCalifornia more |
10/5/2008 - riddler wrote: 75 pointsNot enjoyable at all. Sharp fruit flavor. |
| Red |
2004 3 Blind Moose Cellars Cabernet SauvignonCalifornia more |
8/1/2008 - armchairsommelier wrote: NRUsed for sangria . . . yum! Salud!! |
| White |
2005 3 Blind Moose Cellars ChardonnayCalifornia more |
2/13/2008 - Crystal wrote: 88 pointsa good everyday wine. worked at football party. |
| Red |
2005 3 Blind Moose Cellars MerlotCalifornia more |
1/29/2008 - isaacjamesbaker wrote: 83 pointslight ruby color with a funky blackberry nose. good acidity with lighter flavors of cherries and spice. somehwat thin and light, but this was actually surprisingly drinkable for a cheap, ambiguous merlot. the grapes come primarily from the central coast and lodi. small bits of cabernet, petite sirah and zinfandel in this as well. |
| Red |
2005 3 Blind Moose Cellars Cabernet SauvignonCalifornia more |
1/1/2008 - winemanintheden wrote: 75 pointstried on new year's eve. the positive - cool packaging design, concept and cork. the negative - absolutely no nose once opened. no scent whatsoever. some light cranberry flavours but felt this wine was very poor, no bouquet, boring and cheap. little fruit taste and no complexity. will not buy again. sorry! |
| White |
2006 3 Blind Moose Cellars ChardonnayCalifornia more |
12/12/2007 - ooridoori wrote: 89 pointsI liked it because it was light and smooth. |
| Red |
2004 3 Blind Moose Cellars Cabernet SauvignonCalifornia more |
11/14/2007 - westcoastwannabe wrote: 76 pointsThis wine had nothing distinctive in its taste, which was very short-lived. Very unimpressive. |
| Red |
2004 3 Blind Moose Cellars MerlotCalifornia more |
11/3/2007 - LUTTRELLS wrote: NRSent to the pantry for cooking. |
| Red |
2004 3 Blind Moose Cellars Cabernet SauvignonCalifornia more |
6/9/2007 - yeastbeast wrote: 70 pointsNot fit for human consumption. |
Search Results - Save This Search
- Tasting notes: 59 notes on 20 wines
