Golden yellow color. Drank after the Thibert Macon-Fuisee. More fruity (ripe apples, some tropical elements) and oaky with butterscotch on the finish. Less acidity as would be expected. Bigger mouthfeel. Not my favorite style but not a bad wine for the price.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Good value but got a little heavy towards the end--syrup and sticky. Medium body and some oak and just a cheap Chard. It's almost like they tried to make more out of the wine that what can support it. Pull back on trying to add structure and complexity and focus on a light crisp chard--this seems to fall somewhere in between and loses it identity--but hey, it pretty cheap so I guess I'm asking for a little bit too much.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
At its sales price it is fine, but certainly not worth much more. Moderate amount of oak and some citrus. Would drink again at $8-10, but not more than that.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
A reasonably priced chard that hasn't been beaten to death with oak (yay). Not much on the nose, but taste was fairly lush and cremy without being overbearing--lots of melon.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
4/15/2009 - John wrote: 81 Points
a nice very lightly oaked chard. decent QPR
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
5/18/2008 - cgrimes wrote: 85 Points
Golden yellow color. Drank after the Thibert Macon-Fuisee. More fruity (ripe apples, some tropical elements) and oaky with butterscotch on the finish. Less acidity as would be expected. Bigger mouthfeel. Not my favorite style but not a bad wine for the price.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
6/7/2007 - Maverick wrote: 80 Points
Good value but got a little heavy towards the end--syrup and sticky. Medium body and some oak and just a cheap Chard. It's almost like they tried to make more out of the wine that what can support it. Pull back on trying to add structure and complexity and focus on a light crisp chard--this seems to fall somewhere in between and loses it identity--but hey, it pretty cheap so I guess I'm asking for a little bit too much.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
4/15/2007 - underwds wrote: 82 Points
Surprising amount of melon for a chardonnay. Still, fairly refreshing and not overly-oaked. Fine for a sub-$10 bottle of wine.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
4/9/2007 - thevandelindes wrote: 50 Points
Poured it down the sink based on my first bottle.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
4/9/2007 - thevandelindes wrote: 75 Points
Terrible and out of characteristic for the varietal, like everything I've had from Bogle. Avoid it, there's so much more to enjoy.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
3/26/2007 - pfruge wrote: 84 Points
Nothing notable.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
3/7/2007 - stranman wrote: 80 Points
Good everyday wine. Nothing particularly notable. At under $10 a good value.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
2/10/2007 - StevenBerman wrote: 83 Points
At its sales price it is fine, but certainly not worth much more. Moderate amount of oak and some citrus. Would drink again at $8-10, but not more than that.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
11/25/2006 - sava wrote:
A reasonably priced chard that hasn't been beaten to death with oak (yay). Not much on the nose, but taste was fairly lush and cremy without being overbearing--lots of melon.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
10/16/2006 - Maverick wrote: 86 Points
PRetty darn good for this low priced Chard. Light and clean, medium body with a touch of oak.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment