This very good! Nice pencil lead and tobacco accents to go with the gorgeous dark cherries abound here! Soft tannins after not even an hour decant. Great structure and smooth soft finish. Power and finesse here. Enjoy! Very enjoyable now while its alive and kicking!
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Decanted an hour, drank over 4 hours. Nose - blackcurrants, cassis, black cherry, tobacco, whiff of leather Palate - black fruits, silky tannins, moderate long finish Overall impression is that this is definitely still slightly too young and will benefit from a few more years in bottle, but a nonetheless lovely bottle to drink if you cannot resist opening one.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Smoke a cigar in a flower store and surround yourself with a bushel of currants and red plums and you get the idea of the aromatics here. The wine is elegant, soft, silky, refined, and vibrant, with sweetness and purity to the red berries and spice in the finish. Drink from 2023-2040.
2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Not decanted. Consumed over 2 days. Still young (as expected). First day at the beginnig high acidity, improved during the night. The second day all was more in balance. I'm pretty sure that this will be even better with 5-7 more years in the cellar. First day 92, second day 93 pts.
3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Notes from day 2. N mixed black berries, cassis, graphite, tobacco, all spice. P black berry, plums, cassis, herbs tobacco, leather, earth F long in length, with great acidity and solid tannins at this point with a really good mouthfeel. Overall a really good wine now that will only improve with additional cellaring.
2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
I now have tasted 2 more bottles of this since my first. The other bottles, disappointingly, were not as good as the first. Not sure why. The first one was simply fantastic. Subsequent bottles were okay, but not amazing. They tasted more like daily drinking wines than special occasion wines. The acidity is quite high and the complexity is medium to low. The fruit is muted, but the tannins are approachable. After tasting a few more bottles, I would give it 92 points. I wonder if I gave the last few bottles too much air; the first bottle was pop & pour, and maybe that was better.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
This was quite the treat. Right out of the bottle, this was smooth and open. There is power, but also finesse, and the tannins are not overwhelming; I was surprised at how approachable it is compared to some other '16s I've tried. I got this at Costco for $70 plus tax, which was a great price compared to the >$90 elsewhere. This vintage of Clerk Milion feels a bit pricey but the quality is there. I may try and get some more.
2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
See previous notes. Still a favorite, well...up there with ‘05, ‘89 and ‘86. I stated before about this shutting down, however, the doors are rather open. I actually love a Bordeaux that causes one to ponder; one needs to reflect and appreciate the combination of intellectual and soulful qualities of anything that provides pleasure, and this does just that. This does it all with radiance. Astounding vintages in Bordeaux represent both stunning fruit and finesse. In 2016, that was easily achieved along the Left Bank (with the Right still being magnetic). Drink 2025 -.
This is pure enjoyment. It’s two neighbors on either side cost $800-1500. This is a steal. Just found 18 bottles for $79. I hear that 2017 is maybe a tad better. 96-97 potato potato
3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Decanted and aerated, and this wine was super. Yes, super young, but surprisingly approachable now. Plums, medium fruit, a touch of spiciness, great structure, complexity, approachable tannins, and long finish all jump out. This is a superb wine. I recently had the 2000 Baron Pichon and the 2000 Baron Lalande, and this wine is better. Although much younger, it is still a fantastic wine. For the money, this is a great deal. This is over 95 points. A fantastic Bordeaux.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
55% Cabernet Sauvignon, 29% Merlot, 13% Cabernet Franc and 2% Petit Verdot. 13.5% alcohol.
More intense and richer aroma flavor with lovely blackberries, graphite, salt, light nutmeg and pipe tobacco. This aromas really seduces! Medium bodied wine with classic and slightly subdued fruit that charms. Really fresh. Beautiful berries with blackberries, blueberries, youthful plum, graphite and pepper. Nice tannins. So classic, so good. 94 points.
Even better than the gorgeou ‘15, this has stunning tannins that are polished and slight. There’s copious dark berries, black cherry, graphite, gravel, flower shop and pencil shavings. Very long and wide. This is a mere baby that will surely shut down. Drink 2025 -.
3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
The combination of all that juicy, red fruit, tobacco leaf, touch of dark cocoa and fresh, spicy fruits feels as good as it tastes. Medium bodied, refined and with ample structure to age, give it 7-9 years an this is going to be a very good Pauillac. The wine was made from blending 55% Cabernet Sauvignon, 29% Merlot, 13% Cabernet Franc, 2% Petit Verdot and 1% old vine Carmenere.
2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Hearts Delight 2016 Bordeaux Tasting (Hay Adams - Washington, DC): I was surprised by how expressive this was. Definitely structured well, but the acidity is vibrant and the fruit is fresh and inviting. Lots of spicy tobacco, pepper, herbs, leather and earth already. Obviously young but already showing lots of promise.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
What a super wine! This has depth of flavor, perfectly ripe, juicy, sweet, fresh cassis galore, soft, silky tannins and a finish that keeps on going. This should age without trouble for at least 30 years, but will start drinking well by its 10th birthday.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
More approachable than many other vintages. Limited knowledge of this label but of the ones I have had (2003, 2010, 2015, 2016) seems very approachable this early. Enjoyable today, would like to try in 3-5 years. Hold until 2022. 92-93
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Union des Grands Crus de Bordeaux 2016 Vintage Tasting (Las Vegas, NV): This deep-to-opaque crimson wine is a blend of 55% Cabernet Sauvignon, 29% Merlot, 13% Cabernet Franc, 2% Petit Verdot and 1% Carménère. Brimming with red and black currants, dark plums, baking spices and milk chocolate, this is a medium-bodied wine with virtually no rough edges. Fresh, seamlessly alcoholic and with silky-texured tannins, it glides across the palate throughout the dense middle and lengthy back end. This is already drinking beautifully. I doubt that it will shut down, so don't be hesitant to pop a cork over the next couple of decades. Drink now-2036.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
UNION DES GRANDS CRUS DE BORDEAUX 2016 VINTAGE SAN FRANCISCO. (Metreon, San Francisco, Ca.): UNION DES GRANDS CRUS DE BORDEAUX 2016 VINTAGE SAN FRANCISCO. Nose of tobacco, allspice, black berry, cassis, and forest floor, same on the palate, almost fruit forward today, atypical for this Chateau, big body, slightly brooding fruit, medium amount of soft tannins which is typical for this Chateau, needs 5 years to peak, probably higher score, big fruit, ripe fruit, and a long, long, long finish.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
UGC San Francisco: the 2016 Bordeaux: Quite impressive, nicely balancing the fruit of the vintage with a classicism. Some vintages of this can seem bit rustic, but not the 2016. A bit pricey though otherwise I would be a buyer.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Zachys Grands Crus de Bordeaux 2016 (New York City, NY): One of my fav's tonight. The wine is just so approachable and ready to open tonight. I am sure that the rep of the wine tonight at the UGS event did not properly give this wine the time it needed. That said it drank fabulously but not to its potential.
I found restrained blackberry, some black cherry, certainly Cassis but it also had a finish of tobacco leaf. One of the great left bank wines.
2016 Union Des Grand Crus de Bordeaux (NYC): A very floral nose. I was surprised as to how light and easy to drink this was for a Clerc Milon which I usually find to be a tannic beast in its early days. A long savory finish.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Le Salon des Outsiders de J.M. Quarin (Edition 2018) (Paris, Hôtel Shangri-La): Nez : moins ouvert que le millésime 2015 (le 2016 a été embouteillé en Mai 2018) en l’état, plus sur la retenue. Egalement plus fermé que d’Armailhac 2016. Intensité aromatique moyenne sur de la mûre, du cassis, de la violette, du tabac et une touche mentholée, de cardamome. Bouche : entrée en bouche plus sur la retenue que Clerc Milon 2015, offrant tout de même un jus précis de fruits noirs entremêlé de notes chocolatées. Le palais dévoile un corps plus solide, plus sombre que le millésime 2015 (fruits noirs, tabac, chocolat), une texture plus serrée, et une structure tannique plus imposante mais le grain de tanin est noble. Le milieu de bouche développe un bel équilibre et une acidité juteuse. C’est globalement très bien fait. Par rapport à d’Armailhac 2016, Clerc Milon 2016 affiche plus de structure et de densité, et sera approchable à plus long terme. Finale juteuse, d’assez belle longueur sur des fruits noirs et du chocolat avec des tanins qui se resserrent en l’état. Note : 17/20 i.e. 94/100
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Retaining its depth of color, the wine easily shows off its black raspberry, cassis, cocoa and floral notes. Silky tannins with a hint of salt and a purity of fruit with freshness for lift keep the layers of fruit on its toes.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Tasted next to 2016 d'Armailhac. A bit more restrained in comparison, less blunt and forward, more serious, showing more depth on the nose. Lovely mix of ripe dark fruit, exotic spices, liquorice. On the palate again a little less expressive, finer tannins, good grip, mineral, concentrated, spicy, long. Lots of potential. Very impressive. 94-95+
2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
With quite a dark ruby color, there is chocolate-covered black raspberry, plum, and cigar box with a floral nose. The palate has a richness that I've never seen here before. Concentrated, polished, silky, sweet and fresh, the wine is long with real depth of flavor, ending with a salty complexity in the finish. This is a new level of quality for Clerc Milon. Blending 55% Cabernet Sauvignon, 29% Merlot, 13% Cabernet Franc, 2% Petit Verdot and 1% old vine Carmenere, this wine reached 13.6% alcohol with a pH of 3.58. The harvest took place September 26 to October 15.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
4/7/2024 - Genevrieres wrote: 94 Points
Way too young to drink now, on my standard. But enormous potential.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
3/23/2024 - Marquis du Vin Likes this wine: 95 Points
This very good! Nice pencil lead and tobacco accents to go with the gorgeous dark cherries abound here! Soft tannins after not even an hour decant. Great structure and smooth soft finish. Power and finesse here. Enjoy! Very enjoyable now while its alive and kicking!
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
12/17/2023 - ycyee Likes this wine: 92 Points
Decanted an hour, drank over 4 hours.
Nose - blackcurrants, cassis, black cherry, tobacco, whiff of leather
Palate - black fruits, silky tannins, moderate long finish
Overall impression is that this is definitely still slightly too young and will benefit from a few more years in bottle, but a nonetheless lovely bottle to drink if you cannot resist opening one.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
11/23/2023 - Jeff Leve wrote: 95 Points
Smoke a cigar in a flower store and surround yourself with a bushel of currants and red plums and you get the idea of the aromatics here. The wine is elegant, soft, silky, refined, and vibrant, with sweetness and purity to the red berries and spice in the finish. Drink from 2023-2040.
2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
1/29/2023 - happy712 wrote:
Wound up very tight. Second day, still very tannic, giving nothing. No amount of aeration helps. Hold for 5+ years
3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
7/13/2022 - Collector1855 wrote: 92 Points
This has quite a bit of oak, good fruit, solid but bit of a let down in the context of the top 2016 Medoc vintage.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
4/12/2022 - Gooddummy Likes this wine: 97 Points
Ambrosia
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
2/6/2022 - Romol Likes this wine: 93 Points
Not decanted. Consumed over 2 days. Still young (as expected). First day at the beginnig high acidity, improved during the night. The second day all was more in balance. I'm pretty sure that this will be even better with 5-7 more years in the cellar. First day 92, second day 93 pts.
3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
2/15/2021 - manonthemoon wrote: 94 Points
Notes from day 2.
N mixed black berries, cassis, graphite, tobacco, all spice.
P black berry, plums, cassis, herbs tobacco, leather, earth
F long in length, with great acidity and solid tannins at this point with a really good mouthfeel.
Overall a really good wine now that will only improve with additional cellaring.
2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
2/6/2021 - SPLJEG Likes this wine: 93 Points
The wine looks ruby colored. The body is medium. The wine has smooth texture. The wine finishes long. The wine has high acidity.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
12/4/2020 - Gooddummy Likes this wine: 96 Points
Was a great hit at Thanksgiving.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
10/19/2020 - Sfflyer123 wrote: 92 Points
I now have tasted 2 more bottles of this since my first. The other bottles, disappointingly, were not as good as the first. Not sure why. The first one was simply fantastic. Subsequent bottles were okay, but not amazing. They tasted more like daily drinking wines than special occasion wines. The acidity is quite high and the complexity is medium to low. The fruit is muted, but the tannins are approachable. After tasting a few more bottles, I would give it 92 points. I wonder if I gave the last few bottles too much air; the first bottle was pop & pour, and maybe that was better.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
9/26/2020 - Gooddummy Likes this wine: 96 Points
One of my favorites.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
8/29/2020 - John McCabe wrote: 96 Points
This was quite the treat. Right out of the bottle, this was smooth and open. There is power, but also finesse, and the tannins are not overwhelming; I was surprised at how approachable it is compared to some other '16s I've tried. I got this at Costco for $70 plus tax, which was a great price compared to the >$90 elsewhere. This vintage of Clerk Milion feels a bit pricey but the quality is there. I may try and get some more.
2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
8/28/2020 - Matt Scott Likes this wine: 95 Points
See previous notes. Still a favorite, well...up there with ‘05, ‘89 and ‘86. I stated before about this shutting down, however, the doors are rather open. I actually love a Bordeaux that causes one to ponder; one needs to reflect and appreciate the combination of intellectual and soulful qualities of anything that provides pleasure, and this does just that. This does it all with radiance.
Astounding vintages in Bordeaux represent both stunning fruit and finesse. In 2016, that was easily achieved along the Left Bank (with the Right still being magnetic). Drink 2025 -.
4 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comments (3)
8/7/2020 - Gooddummy Likes this wine: 96 Points
This is pure enjoyment. It’s two neighbors on either side cost $800-1500. This is a steal. Just found 18 bottles for $79. I hear that 2017 is maybe a tad better. 96-97 potato potato
3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
7/14/2020 - Sfflyer123 Likes this wine: 96 Points
Decanted and aerated, and this wine was super. Yes, super young, but surprisingly approachable now. Plums, medium fruit, a touch of spiciness, great structure, complexity, approachable tannins, and long finish all jump out. This is a superb wine. I recently had the 2000 Baron Pichon and the 2000 Baron Lalande, and this wine is better. Although much younger, it is still a fantastic wine. For the money, this is a great deal. This is over 95 points. A fantastic Bordeaux.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
11/28/2019 - Andre Brattland wrote: 94 Points
55% Cabernet Sauvignon, 29% Merlot, 13% Cabernet Franc and 2% Petit Verdot. 13.5% alcohol.
More intense and richer aroma flavor with lovely blackberries, graphite, salt, light nutmeg and pipe tobacco. This aromas really seduces! Medium bodied wine with classic and slightly subdued fruit that charms. Really fresh. Beautiful berries with blackberries, blueberries, youthful plum, graphite and pepper. Nice tannins. So classic, so good. 94 points.
4 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comments (1)
11/5/2019 - Matt Scott Likes this wine: 95 Points
Even better than the gorgeou ‘15, this has stunning tannins that are polished and slight. There’s copious dark berries, black cherry, graphite, gravel, flower shop and pencil shavings. Very long and wide. This is a mere baby that will surely shut down. Drink 2025 -.
3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
9/21/2019 - Jeff Leve wrote: 94 Points
The combination of all that juicy, red fruit, tobacco leaf, touch of dark cocoa and fresh, spicy fruits feels as good as it tastes. Medium bodied, refined and with ample structure to age, give it 7-9 years an this is going to be a very good Pauillac. The wine was made from blending 55% Cabernet Sauvignon, 29% Merlot, 13% Cabernet Franc, 2% Petit Verdot and 1% old vine Carmenere.
2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
3/8/2019 - isaacjamesbaker wrote: 93 Points
Hearts Delight 2016 Bordeaux Tasting (Hay Adams - Washington, DC): I was surprised by how expressive this was. Definitely structured well, but the acidity is vibrant and the fruit is fresh and inviting. Lots of spicy tobacco, pepper, herbs, leather and earth already. Obviously young but already showing lots of promise.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
2/25/2019 - Zweder wrote: flawed
UCGB tasting Bordeaux 2016 (Beurs van Berlage, Amsterdam.): Unfortunately a corked bottle and I did not find the opportunity to taste the wine later that day.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
2/25/2019 - Xavier Auerbach wrote: 91 Points
Amsterdam UGCB Tasting and Winemakers' Dinner (Beurs van Berlage / Café De Klepel): Not as precise as Armailhac, a bit more fluffy, but a lovely expression of Pauillac none the less.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
2/25/2019 - FransS wrote: 94 Points
The 2016 vintage UGCB tasting in Amsterdam 2/25/2019; 2/25/2019-2/27/2019 (Amsterdam): Cream, bitters and black fruit in the bouquet, très Pauillac, juicy, classic, a lovely and stylish wine.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
2/10/2019 - Jeff Leve wrote: 95 Points
What a super wine! This has depth of flavor, perfectly ripe, juicy, sweet, fresh cassis galore, soft, silky tannins and a finish that keeps on going. This should age without trouble for at least 30 years, but will start drinking well by its 10th birthday.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
1/27/2019 - LiteItOnFire Likes this wine:
More approachable than many other vintages. Limited knowledge of this label but of the ones I have had (2003, 2010, 2015, 2016) seems very approachable this early. Enjoyable today, would like to try in 3-5 years. Hold until 2022. 92-93
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
1/26/2019 - La Cave d'Argent Likes this wine: 94 Points
Union des Grands Crus de Bordeaux 2016 Vintage Tasting (Las Vegas, NV): This deep-to-opaque crimson wine is a blend of 55% Cabernet Sauvignon, 29% Merlot, 13% Cabernet Franc, 2% Petit Verdot and 1% Carménère. Brimming with red and black currants, dark plums, baking spices and milk chocolate, this is a medium-bodied wine with virtually no rough edges. Fresh, seamlessly alcoholic and with silky-texured tannins, it glides across the palate throughout the dense middle and lengthy back end. This is already drinking beautifully. I doubt that it will shut down, so don't be hesitant to pop a cork over the next couple of decades. Drink now-2036.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
1/25/2019 - bestdamncab Likes this wine: 94 Points
UNION DES GRANDS CRUS DE BORDEAUX 2016 VINTAGE SAN FRANCISCO. (Metreon, San Francisco, Ca.): UNION DES GRANDS CRUS DE BORDEAUX 2016 VINTAGE SAN FRANCISCO. Nose of tobacco, allspice, black berry, cassis, and forest floor, same on the palate, almost fruit forward today, atypical for this Chateau, big body, slightly brooding fruit, medium amount of soft tannins which is typical for this Chateau, needs 5 years to peak, probably higher score, big fruit, ripe fruit, and a long, long, long finish.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
1/25/2019 - blanquito wrote:
UGC San Francisco: the 2016 Bordeaux: Quite impressive, nicely balancing the fruit of the vintage with a classicism. Some vintages of this can seem bit rustic, but not the 2016. A bit pricey though otherwise I would be a buyer.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
1/25/2019 - Woodbridge Brad Likes this wine: 91 Points
Union des Grands Crus de Bordeaux Tasting of the 2016 Vintage (Metreon San Francisco): At $90+ this is currently a pricy study in tannin and acid. It does have all the right stuff, but it needs 5 plus years at least and I am not sure that will be enough
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
1/21/2019 - tomoem Likes this wine: 94 Points
Zachys Grands Crus de Bordeaux 2016 (New York City, NY): One of my fav's tonight. The wine is just so approachable and ready to open tonight. I am sure that the rep of the wine tonight at the UGS event did not properly give this wine the time it needed. That said it drank fabulously but not to its potential.
I found restrained blackberry, some black cherry, certainly Cassis but it also had a finish of tobacco leaf. One of the great left bank wines.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comments (1)
1/21/2019 - jgreco Likes this wine: 93 Points
2016 Union Des Grand Crus de Bordeaux (NYC): A very floral nose. I was surprised as to how light and easy to drink this was for a Clerc Milon which I usually find to be a tannic beast in its early days. A long savory finish.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
11/16/2018 - I've Got Bottle (JP Abela) wrote: 94 Points
Le Salon des Outsiders de J.M. Quarin (Edition 2018) (Paris, Hôtel Shangri-La): Nez : moins ouvert que le millésime 2015 (le 2016 a été embouteillé en Mai 2018) en l’état, plus sur la retenue. Egalement plus fermé que d’Armailhac 2016. Intensité aromatique moyenne sur de la mûre, du cassis, de la violette, du tabac et une touche mentholée, de cardamome.
Bouche : entrée en bouche plus sur la retenue que Clerc Milon 2015, offrant tout de même un jus précis de fruits noirs entremêlé de notes chocolatées.
Le palais dévoile un corps plus solide, plus sombre que le millésime 2015 (fruits noirs, tabac, chocolat), une texture plus serrée, et une structure tannique plus imposante mais le grain de tanin est noble. Le milieu de bouche développe un bel équilibre et une acidité juteuse. C’est globalement très bien fait.
Par rapport à d’Armailhac 2016, Clerc Milon 2016 affiche plus de structure et de densité, et sera approchable à plus long terme.
Finale juteuse, d’assez belle longueur sur des fruits noirs et du chocolat avec des tanins qui se resserrent en l’état.
Note : 17/20 i.e. 94/100
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
5/13/2018 - Jeff Leve wrote: 94 Points
Retaining its depth of color, the wine easily shows off its black raspberry, cassis, cocoa and floral notes. Silky tannins with a hint of salt and a purity of fruit with freshness for lift keep the layers of fruit on its toes.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
7/5/2017 - rossi.wine wrote: 95 Points
Tasted next to 2016 d'Armailhac. A bit more restrained in comparison, less blunt and forward, more serious, showing more depth on the nose. Lovely mix of ripe dark fruit, exotic spices, liquorice. On the palate again a little less expressive, finer tannins, good grip, mineral, concentrated, spicy, long. Lots of potential. Very impressive. 94-95+
2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
4/29/2017 - Jeff Leve wrote: 94 Points
With quite a dark ruby color, there is chocolate-covered black raspberry, plum, and cigar box with a floral nose. The palate has a richness that I've never seen here before. Concentrated, polished, silky, sweet and fresh, the wine is long with real depth of flavor, ending with a salty complexity in the finish. This is a new level of quality for Clerc Milon. Blending 55% Cabernet Sauvignon, 29% Merlot, 13% Cabernet Franc, 2% Petit Verdot and 1% old vine Carmenere, this wine reached 13.6% alcohol with a pH of 3.58. The harvest took place September 26 to October 15.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment