Advertisement

Who Likes This Wine(2)

  1. Unterco

    Unterco

    9 Tasting Notes

  2. Alex G.

    Alex G.

    3,205 Tasting Notes

Food Pairing Tags

Add My Food Pairing Tags

Community Tasting Notes (15) Median Score: 90 points

  • Tasted blind. Really nice nose here sour cherry, sweet spices, some gamy elements. The palate was crisp with polished tannins. The 20 years in bottle has done this wine well. Nicolas Potel is a hit or miss producer, so glad to see that this bottle did well.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Stored at 55 since release, nearly perfect cork shows a trace (1mm wide streak) of color up 3/4 of the way up one side. Decanted, little sediment.
    Color is a medium drop ruby to a thin watery rim.
    Very pretty nose of exotic spice (Chinese five spice, star anise, all spice, cloves) approaching floral aromatics, but not quite violet, and a faint resinous note. Ripe blackberries, no signs of decay, with an underlying cool soil like minerality.
    Ripe forward fruit and zingy acidity on the attack along with some drying tannins. Medium bodied, medium high acid and ripe but still drying tannins. Solid core of ripe mature fruit. Long juicy finish starts fruity and turns stony.
    Overall drinking beautifully at or near peak.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • May Day at Maison Dakota. Leftover from 2 days ago.
    Appearance is clear, medium intensity, garnet colour. Legs.
    Nose medium+ intensity, with aromas of soy sauce, tertiary earth, dark rred d cherries, floral spice, musk. Developed.
    On the palate, dry, high acidity, medium alcohol (13%), powdery almost integrated meidum tannins, medium+ body. Medium+ flavour intensity, with flavours of dark red cherries, black cherries, red plums, soy sauce, earth, animal leather, spice. Long finish.
    Very good quality. Apparently was rather tight austere when poped on day 1. Tastes like it probably should be drinking at prak now already, so maybe just needs some air time then good to go. Or could be lots of bottle variation also.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Dark brick and cloudy in appearance. Not much of nose left. Little life in the beginning but surprisingly after several hours in the glass, gave some nose of rose, some dark cherries and spice on the palette

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Served from magnum, and this got drunk by the group faster than everything else, so that speaks volumes. Lovely exotic spice nose, rich dark fruit, long finish. Evolved well and softened in the glass. No rush to drink this will probably live a long time. To my palate, this is a "sweet spot" Red Burgundy. Potel seems to have done really well in this vintage, this bottle and the '01 Richebourg are the best Potels I've had in years - and oddly had a string of terrible '99's.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

View all 15 Community Tasting Notes

What Do You Think? Add a Tasting Note

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.

Vinous

  • By Stephen Tanzer
    March/April 2003, IWC Issue #107, (See more on Vinous...)

    (Nicolas Potel Vosne-Romanee Aux Malconsorts) Login and sign up and see review text.

Burghound

NOTE: Some content is property of Vinous and Burghound.

Add a Pro Review Add Your Own Reviews:
 

Advertisement

×