Drank after a 1990 Dom Perignon and actually it didn't suck, considering. In fact, this was the best bottle that I've had of these! Who'd have thunk it'd improve over time... the first few bottles were quite rough but this one was very nice.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
12/31/2014 - David Paris (dbp) wrote:
Drank after a 1990 Dom Perignon and actually it didn't suck, considering. In fact, this was the best bottle that I've had of these! Who'd have thunk it'd improve over time... the first few bottles were quite rough but this one was very nice.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
1/1/2012 - ckeilah wrote: 84 Points
Good stuff for what it is. Hell, just good stuff. With a sense of humor. :-)
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
5/29/2011 - foobarski wrote: 84 Points
Made a pleasant enough dinner pairing with fairly spicy red curry Thai chicken. I definitely tasted yeastiness, even at this late date.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
1/1/2011 - AdamRobert wrote: 84 Points
Nothing to write home about, but solid and well-made. Maybe not the best QPR but the label was funny.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
1/1/2011 - pechluck wrote: 75 Points
Plain and simple, sparkles with bubbles but little flavor, good in a mimosa. We all bought the bottle because of the label anyway, admit it...
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment