Vintners Hall, London
Tasted Tuesday, November 3, 2015 by Papies with 956 views
To Quote Charles Taylor MW " To summarise, the best wines have good structure, ripe fruit, fine freshness and will age gracefully. Others are too tannic for the weight of the fruit and will always lack charm and generosity"
We agree 100% and in general many of our notes mention "winemaker opted for ripeness and sacrificed freshness"
The sweets are superb and a great year for them and were delicious even young!
We did not try all the wines and as always we rated based on how they felt of the day, NOT on outlook.
Not really impressed barring a stunning, for the vintage, Figeac.
St Julien and Pauillac were the clearly better on average.
Quite elegant, dark fruit nose, light herby, quite a bit of tannin, but well structured and with decent element of fruit. A pretty nice wine for the vintage. ( 90)
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
Surprisingly restraint wine, both on ripeness but also extraction and oak. Litchi touch of oak is present at this age, not the overdone monster we thought we would have expected. Rich fruit notes, dark fruited , good on palate, roundish, and with good not angular though tannin . In a nice place and quite approachable and among the better wines we tried on the day from the 2011 vintage (91-92)
Post a Comment / 3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
Leafy, dark fruits on the nose. A touch flat however , lacks persistence of flavour and depth. Almost no energy . Decent fruit but feels like for the sake of ripeness they sacrificed the life and the freshness. Nowhere near the Haut Brion in level this year. ( 89).
Post a Comment / 2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
Quite impressive on the nose, ripe dark fruit, light herbs. Quite decent fruit on the palate too and once again we came across that lack of acidity and freshness in favour of ripe fruit. Felt also a bit watery on the mid palate ( 88)
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
Quite a ripe nose of fruit, rich nose, light herby edge. Singing. Good on the palate too, on the round side, firm tannin, lacks a bit of freshness much like many of the 2011s, but overall a pretty wine. (90+)
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
A herby-er expression on the nose less fruit. Lots of tannin, big and grippy, but not aggressive or green. Good wine but lacks a bit of acidity to give it harmony and freshness .
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
Peppery dark fruit nose . Good ripe fruit, firm tannin, rich core of fruit on the palate but comes at a sacrifice to they freshness of the wine and doesn't feel vibrant enough. At times felt a little bit flat. (89-90)
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
A disappointing wine given the pedigree and expectation, let alone price. Light mocha on the nose, good dark fruit, a lot of youthful, grippy tannin, decent fruit core but lacks in style, almost dull and not vibrant at all. They could have done a lot better. (87)
Post a Comment / 2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
Light spicy, rich fruit nose. Good balance, again another wine that sacrificed freshness for ripe fruit, a touch modern in a way, good wine relatively and approachable now. (89)
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
Impressive nose, fresh and herby, leafy very Cabernet nose. Dark fruit, good level of fruit, could have been a bit fresher but overall a great effort and a good wine. Definitely ( and adjusted for price) one to pay attention to (90)
Post a Comment / 2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
Dark, ripe, raisiny and on the overdone side. Almost porty. Not sure what they were trying to do here or whether they were trying to rescue what was left post that famous hailstorm but a clear disappointment especially comparing with the stellar result that Montrose delivered. Unlucky with nature or on the wrong path (85)
Post a Comment / 2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
Quite an impressive wine, and at par with first growths. Beautiful nose, vibrant fruit, well balanced mineral and pretty solid. This is the must have wine of the 2011s we felt .(93-94)
Post a Comment / 4 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
Quite a blunt effort here ticks a few boxes but lacked charm and magic. A touch flat and not as inspiring as we expected. (88)
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
Muted nose, an ok wine but not impressive. Needs time we think as it has a good density of fruit and decent acidity but the tannins are too much and need time to soften. (88)
Post a Comment / 3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
A pretty solid and harmonious wine. Good balance of ripeness and freshness (something most wines did not have ) elegant and very nice to see GL continue to make solid old school wines. One to own. (91)
Post a Comment / 2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
A chateau we always consider a great find and great value for money, however it did not perform in 2011. Quite dry, muted and very tannic. Not a bad wine but not a great result either. (87)
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
Good wine and one that shown on the day. Lovely balance and harmony. Decent fruit, good density of flavour and maintained a classy feel across. Nice depth too. A pretty solid wine and one we would look for. (91)
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
Good but restrained, buttoned down but full of energy and stuffing to evolve into something special in the future. A sleeping boxer of a wine here but we are very hopeful that given time this will be special as it had both the rig ripeness of fruit and acidity. (92)
Post a Comment / 3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
Touch thin on the fruit side and aggressive on the tannin. A few off-putting notes on the nose at times too, not one we spent long time around. (87)
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
Light and muted on the nose. Light on the body, a touch lacking of fruit density across and generally felt not up to standard and a bit average. (88)
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
Good nose, light spice, bright fruit, vibrant wine, good tannin, well made and stood out. Young of course and needs time but this is one of the successes of 2011. (92)
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
Good to see that they now tone down the oak. Harmonious wine and balanced good fruit a feel of rich fruit, decent freshness, a pretty solid wine until one tries the Pichon Lalande tbh. (90)
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
A very classy and charming wine here. Even at number 86 with all the palate fatigue this shown like the star it is. Elegant, well round, IB tune and in a way delicate. Good fruit density, freshness and a lot of structure. A. Erg solid result given the vintage and second to Montrose for us outside the premier . (92-93)
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
Light nose, dark fruits, a touch of raisiny edge a few times but not one to put us of from seeing what a beautiful wine this is . Nice balance, well made, good structure and almost soft at times. Big tannin of course but not overpowering. Very very good, (92)
Post a Comment / 3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
Spice, cloves, light raising on the nose. Medium bodied, big tannin, lacks a fresh feel. A it overripe and in general we felt it was lacking and was not impressed at all. (88)
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
Not a very developed wine at all, especially on the nose. Shy , closed, not singing. Obv very young and to be honest barring the name nothing really of interest here at this stage. At least it felt it had balance and hopefully time will help it catch up to its price.
Post a Comment / 2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
The first probably wine in the line up that we found a fresh and vibrant core. Good ripe fruit, well mannered wine, a bit of oaky dynamics still linger. Proper wine even in a challenging vintage like 2011. Elegant and albeit very young had a solid feel to it.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
12.5% alc here! Herby nose, good balance, elegant wine albeit on the shy side at this stage. Nice harmony and showed sides of a bib rant core of fruit. Very elegant wine. 92 for now though.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
Essence of effortless balance here. Lovely wine, good fruit, good tannin, no sharp edges and green notes. Could have been a bit more vibrant but overall very nice and dare say delicious even at this stage.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
The best nose of the tasting by a mile. Elegant as expected, balanced, good fruit, nice persistence of flavour and just a has a hidden gem feel to it. Very good.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
Liquid gold and stood head and shoulders vs the other sweets in the tasting. 2011 looks like a year for the whites. We should make the argument for trying this wine even now as it is utterly delicious. Harmony, balance, fresh . Maybe the best the 2011 has to offer?
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
Nice fresh wine, lovely fruit, good rich profile , long and complex. Very brig and vibrant. Solid effort here and we would suggest as with many 2011s to try a few young. (92-93)
Post a Comment / 3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
Barring the Yquem this was the best of the sweets. Good density of fruit, lovely elegance, depth and supercomplex even at this young age. Impossible to resist to be honest and we really loved it. (94+) a must buy.
Post a Comment / 2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
Came 3rd after the Yquem and the Riussec but even still have very little to be jealous from them. Fresh, lively and bright, nice balanced sweetness and just utterly delicious. (93)
Post a Comment / 2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
Quite restrained to be honest vs the rest of the sweets and lighter on the fruit density too. Not as opulent as the rest and not sure if it's because it's gone to sleep or just the level of it.
Post a Comment / 2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
© 2003-24 CellarTracker! LLC. All rights reserved. "CellarTracker!" is a trademark of CellarTracker! LLC. No part of this website may be used, reproduced or distributed without the prior written permission of CellarTracker! LLC.
2011 Château Canon-la-Gaffelière 90 Points
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, St. Émilion Grand Cru
Quite a ripe fruit, opulent nose, light cacao, oaky dynamics. Def one of the more oaky ones. Well ripe and roundish , good rich fruit, impressive even young. Quite a bit of tannin but importantly has a good persistence of flavour. (90)
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
2011 Château Figeac 93 Points
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, St. Émilion Grand Cru
The best one of the right bank .
Balanced and harmonious wine, light herbaceous nose. Fresh , one of the very few we came across in 2011, very elegant and classy even at this young age. Very nice dark fruit too. (92-93)
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
2011 Château Lafleur 87 Points
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Pomerol
Quite restrained, shy nose, light dark fruit. On the palate it's just not really "present" and was not impressive at all. Not sure what more we can say here. (87)
Post a Comment / 2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
2011 Château Troplong Mondot 91 Points
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, St. Émilion Grand Cru
Shy on the nose, light dark fruit mix, light herby and floral. Quite "silky" on the palate in a way good fine grain tannin, elegant wine albeit muscular wine.Quite a bit of of oak still on the palate but time will help it, light chocolate notes.has a punch too but very good and carries the 14.5% alc quite well. (90-91)
Read 2 Comments / Post a Comment / 2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
2011 Château La Fleur-Pétrus 87 Points
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Pomerol
Shy and restraint on the nose . Few green notes on the tannin front, quite blunt and at times flat and dare we say watery. An ok wine but not up to the pedigree.(87)
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
2011 Château Trotanoy 89 Points
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Pomerol
14.5% alc here. Ripe and rich nose, big and rich on the palate too, but also lacks freshness and vitality. Maybe a bit of green tannin too. (89)
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
2011 Château Clinet 87 Points
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Pomerol
Not a fan of this wine at this stage. Light and raisiny, a touch off putting at times and lacked structure. We gave up. 87
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
2011 Château La Conseillante 87 Points
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Pomerol
Quite a ripe, rich oaky nose on the forefront. Clearly here they went for ripeness at all cost and on the way dropped off acidity and freshness. Approachable now but for the wrong reasons. (87)
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
2011 Château Petit Village 89 Points
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Pomerol
One of the surprises and clearly here the light handed approach got it right.
Quite a bit of a fruity, dark fruits, nose, light oaky feel, herbaceous. Decent freshness ( especially compared with its neighbours) harmonious and pretty. A pretty solid (89)
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue