5/3/2024 - Ticker tape guy Likes this wine:

so good dark brooding red fruit some leather and a hint of smoke went so well with grilled chicken wings

5/1/2024 - tward wrote:

Good-
Meh, drank most of it over two nights. It is certainly not bad and shows enough substance to be "good", but it was never in balance. Ripe fruit neither cloying nor clean, some acid, but it felt clunky. Poor Garagiste "Mystery" buy - glad I only bought one at $30 USD.

13.6% abv

Empty bottle weight: 687g

5/3/2024 - gnsti wrote:

라임, 살구, 레몬, 백도, 사과?, 하얀꽃, 살짝 꿀
좋은 산미, 프레쉬한 내음에 깔끔한 질감
와인만 마셔도 좋다.
차갑게 마시는게 더 좋다.
(살짝 타고 올라온, 완벽한 상태는 아니였다.)

5/3/2024 - nkirsch Likes this wine:

Opened about 30 minutes before drinking. Longer would be better because the wine opened up with time. Good fruit with a bit of an earthy profile. Nice aroma

5/3/2024 - whudock Likes this wine:

very firm tannin, cherry fruit, good complexity. Needs a couple of years in the cellar to hit its prime

5/3/2024 - K&B wrote:

Beautiful - plump fruit, slightly stewed but also still fresh, balanced and considered. A lovely surprise.

5/2/2024 - Chapel Likes this wine:

Smooth, balanced moderate berry flavor. No raisin or alcoholic aspects. Fabulous wine and paired well with several meals.
Used a Coravin over 10 days. Then drank the remainder (~1/3) after uncorking.
This wine can still agae

5/3/2024 - Claret & CdP Gang Likes this wine:

Beautiful wine, lovely nose of cherries, earth, powerful yet elegant, beautiful balance, would beat most Barolos, just about ready but with long life ahead
93+

5/3/2024 - WineGuyDelMar Likes this wine:

Took to Florida to share with Mark1npt & Carol. Marks note is right on as far as it seems older. My last bottle of this so on to my 15 2015 bottles. I would drink sooner than later as theruit and tannins are fading. Still some nice Cab flavors & enough structure to make it enjoyable.

5/3/2024 - Lord Rodney wrote:

In a world - sublime. Perfect balance between fruits and oxidation 😎✌🏻 2011 is great in Jura

5/3/2024 - Winokdub wrote:

Really enjoyable. Let this one air out for hours sipping along thecway and it may have been a hair better than the previous bottle. Yum

5/3/2024 - Burgnick Likes this wine:

Some Volnay elegance but it showed earthiness. Quite common with the domaine’s wine in this era.

5/3/2024 - WineGuyDelMar Likes this wine:

Drinking beautifully right now. Same as previous notes. Probably won’t improve from here.

4/15/2024 - PolarBear22 wrote:

Had with friends. Nice color. Still showing great fruit. It was enjoyed by all. And one commented that this was still young.

5/3/2024 - Livonietisr Likes this wine:

Light yellow color. Aromas of yellow apples, peach, white flowers, tobacco. Fresh acidity, viscous, saline, mineral, buttery. Taste of peach, yellow apple, orange zest. Long

12/11/2015 - Putnam Weekley Likes this wine:

I'm still holding a torch for this cuvée in 2024

4/29/2024 - PolarBear22 wrote:

Color is still solid to edges. Nice dark fruit on nose and palate. This wine is still doing great.

5/3/2024 - Vinogan(s) Likes this wine:

Seems quite young even, but very good sangiovese from higher altitude. Good typicity

5/3/2024 - thomasito2001 Likes this wine:

See my previous note, very pleasant and a great wine to drink, but not much evolution since last time and still lacking complexity. A somewhat unidimensional behemoth.

5/3/2024 - ThijsPiet Likes this wine:

Punchy aroma. Lovely full taste of green apple and peach, can stand up against smoked salmon

5/3/2024 - Vinogan(s) wrote:

Showing super young. Heavy stuff, a bit too much even for me. Difficult to score this

5/3/2024 - Vinogan(s) wrote:

Too evolved for my liking

5/3/2024 - Vinogan(s) wrote:

Black fruits, round, deep, some bitterness to complete the picture. Top winemaking on display here, but somewhat lacking the "X-factor" here (identity / "soul")

5/3/2024 - Vinogan(s) wrote:

Meaty, dark fruits, lots of body, spices. Still young, 91+

5/3/2024 - wineton.mee wrote:

The 2008 Comtes is simply going from strength to strength. The most ready rendition I’ve had, full of brioche, lemon curd, toasted almond, honey, and marzipan. Super giving on both the nose and palate, and will probably stay like this for a long time to come.

5/3/2024 - sheenanigans wrote:

-

5/3/2024 - Vinogan(s) Likes this wine:

Excellent sangiovese in a somewhat difficult vintage for this estate. 92+

5/3/2024 - tomlee wrote:

Golden in color. 14.5% ABV. Pretty nose of stone fruits, pear and fresh cut grass. Medium body with racy acidity. Crisp and refreshing with bright fruits. Green apple, grapefruit, lemon and minerals on the palate. The finish is long and spicy. Really delicious and always one of the best Sauvignon Blancs from the Russian River Valley. My bottles will likely be consumed this Summer!

5/3/2024 - Vinogan(s) Likes this wine:

Pretty much in line with my note of October 2021, continues to drink great on pnp. A fitting farewell for my last bottle

5/3/2024 - jdrosen Likes this wine:

Low/Med complexity. More fruity than mineral.

5/3/2024 - wiscgrad wrote:

probably the best viognier I've ever had. qualifier being I haven't had that many but also most have been quite flabby and viscous. this was linear. but had plenty of fruit as well and there was plenty going on on the nose as well. no rush

5/3/2024 - Vinogan(s) wrote:

Coffee, evolution, herbs, juicy, very interwoven, lon,g and complex, irresistible wine

5/3/2024 - Dukes88 Likes this wine:

Yeasty nose, bubbles were somewhat aggressive, just needs time.

5/3/2024 - Vinogan(s) wrote:

Concentrated power, sweet fruit, unctuous, full body, black fruits, maybe a little higher in the future as this is still quite young 91+

5/3/2024 - mark_k Likes this wine:

My last bottle. It’s broad, creamy and chalky. Fizz fades in the glass but I think it drinks really well like that, almost like a good white burgundy. Mineral driven and quite leesy.

5/3/2024 - Vinogan(s) Likes this wine:

Red fruits and plum, quite powerful in the mouth whereas the nose is more delicate

5/3/2024 - mark_k Likes this wine:

PNP and good to go with a bit of swirling. Finding the 14s and 12s from Piedmont very appealing right now. Roses and tar, very floral with lighter body than some of the ‘better’ vintages, but yet with good grip. A pleasant 13.5% ABV

5/3/2024 - Vinogan(s) wrote:

Terroir, unattractive nose but the mouth is ok

5/3/2024 - Vinogan(s) Does not like this wine:

Very full bodied and vanillic

5/3/2024 - Vinogan(s) wrote:

Green and grassy, white fruit, lots of volume, rich and expressive, acidity

5/3/2024 - Vinogan(s) Likes this wine:

Gunsmoke, smoky, minerals, some reduction first, very, very long

5/3/2024 - GT9966 wrote:

Fleisch & pasta

5/3/2024 - Vinogan(s) wrote:

Oxidative side, hay, light apple

5/3/2024 - Vinogan(s) wrote:

Ripe peach, white fruits, pineapple

5/1/2024 - Cailles wrote:

23x California 1974: Do the legendary 1974s still hold up? The answer is a resounding YES, and not just for one or two top wines, but across the board. These best wines showed incredible complexity, with still vibrant fruit cores perfectly complemented by layers upon layers of tertiary aromas, a fully intact structural frame, stature, poise, and freshness. While many of these wines should continue to age well, I don't expect them to get any better than they are now. The top wines in the tasting were the Mondavi Cabernet and the Phelps Insignia (both 97pts), the Mondavi Reserve and the Mount Eden (both 96pts), and the Ridge Monte Bello (95pts). Many more wines scored in the 90-94 point range. I'm convinced that many wines would have scored even higher in a different tasting setting, where you can follow the wine over the course of an evening. Only 5 of the 24 bottles showed signs of weakness, with 1 of those already oxidized, but given the substance that could be tasted underneath, this is more likely due to weak corks or poor storage than anything nature delivered this year. All the wines had very good fill levels and had been quickly double decanted before tasting to remove the sediment.

TN: A unicorn sweet wine, produced only in 1974, it spent 17 years in barrel. Many people loved it thanks to an impressive complexity and superb precision, with a sweetness well kept in check by a deep acid backbone. I didn't like the aromatic profile, with lots of dried fruit, and the alcohol was strong on the nose and palate, which is not surprising at 19% alcohol.

5/1/2024 - Cailles wrote:

23x California 1974: Do the legendary 1974s still hold up? The answer is a resounding YES, and not just for one or two top wines, but across the board. These best wines showed incredible complexity, with still vibrant fruit cores perfectly complemented by layers upon layers of tertiary aromas, a fully intact structural frame, stature, poise, and freshness. While many of these wines should continue to age well, I don't expect them to get any better than they are now. The top wines in the tasting were the Mondavi Cabernet and the Phelps Insignia (both 97pts), the Mondavi Reserve and the Mount Eden (both 96pts), and the Ridge Monte Bello (95pts). Many more wines scored in the 90-94 point range. I'm convinced that many wines would have scored even higher in a different tasting setting, where you can follow the wine over the course of an evening. Only 5 of the 24 bottles showed signs of weakness, with 1 of those already oxidized, but given the substance that could be tasted underneath, this is more likely due to weak corks or poor storage than anything nature delivered this year. All the wines had very good fill levels and had been quickly double decanted before tasting to remove the sediment.

TN: This Ridge Monte Bello showcased a bouquet with some impurities, that obscured its otherwise rich dark fruit and mineral profile. However, the palate was much more impressive, displaying intricate layers of cola, truffles, abundant black fruit, and minerals. Over time, complex meaty and bacon fat nuances emerged, enhancing its depth. Despite lacking some refinement compared to the top wines, it was still a standout, showing great potential for further development over many years.

5/1/2024 - Cailles wrote:

23x California 1974: Do the legendary 1974s still hold up? The answer is a resounding YES, and not just for one or two top wines, but across the board. These best wines showed incredible complexity, with still vibrant fruit cores perfectly complemented by layers upon layers of tertiary aromas, a fully intact structural frame, stature, poise, and freshness. While many of these wines should continue to age well, I don't expect them to get any better than they are now. The top wines in the tasting were the Mondavi Cabernet and the Phelps Insignia (both 97pts), the Mondavi Reserve and the Mount Eden (both 96pts), and the Ridge Monte Bello (95pts). Many more wines scored in the 90-94 point range. I'm convinced that many wines would have scored even higher in a different tasting setting, where you can follow the wine over the course of an evening. Only 5 of the 24 bottles showed signs of weakness, with 1 of those already oxidized, but given the substance that could be tasted underneath, this is more likely due to weak corks or poor storage than anything nature delivered this year. All the wines had very good fill levels and had been quickly double decanted before tasting to remove the sediment.

TN: Initially, the wine displayed some tired and unpleasant oxidative characteristics. However, with sufficient exposure to air, these notes mostly dissipated, revealing a robust palate rich in dark berries, malt, leather, tobacco, and mineral tones. It demonstrated a pleasing balance, seamless structure, and refreshing qualities, culminating in a successful tasting experience.

5/1/2024 - Cailles wrote:

23x California 1974: Do the legendary 1974s still hold up? The answer is a resounding YES, and not just for one or two top wines, but across the board. These best wines showed incredible complexity, with still vibrant fruit cores perfectly complemented by layers upon layers of tertiary aromas, a fully intact structural frame, stature, poise, and freshness. While many of these wines should continue to age well, I don't expect them to get any better than they are now. The top wines in the tasting were the Mondavi Cabernet and the Phelps Insignia (both 97pts), the Mondavi Reserve and the Mount Eden (both 96pts), and the Ridge Monte Bello (95pts). Many more wines scored in the 90-94 point range. I'm convinced that many wines would have scored even higher in a different tasting setting, where you can follow the wine over the course of an evening. Only 5 of the 24 bottles showed signs of weakness, with 1 of those already oxidized, but given the substance that could be tasted underneath, this is more likely due to weak corks or poor storage than anything nature delivered this year. All the wines had very good fill levels and had been quickly double decanted before tasting to remove the sediment.

TN: The wine's nose was initially muted and not fully opened, suggesting the need for a lengthy decant. On the palate, it was more expressive, showcasing a classic Pauillac profile with notes of graphite, cool dark fruits, tobacco, and earthy undertones. It displayed remarkable elegance and balance, with a soft and integrated structure. Both Diamond Creek wines, and particularly this Red Rock Terrace, are still qiote young and would benefit from an additional 10 to 20+ years of aging. Decanting is advisable if consumed presently.

5/3/2024 - GT9966 wrote:

Now 37$ (2024) Paris with chicken and turkey

5/1/2024 - Cailles wrote:

23x California 1974: Do the legendary 1974s still hold up? The answer is a resounding YES, and not just for one or two top wines, but across the board. These best wines showed incredible complexity, with still vibrant fruit cores perfectly complemented by layers upon layers of tertiary aromas, a fully intact structural frame, stature, poise, and freshness. While many of these wines should continue to age well, I don't expect them to get any better than they are now. The top wines in the tasting were the Mondavi Cabernet and the Phelps Insignia (both 97pts), the Mondavi Reserve and the Mount Eden (both 96pts), and the Ridge Monte Bello (95pts). Many more wines scored in the 90-94 point range. I'm convinced that many wines would have scored even higher in a different tasting setting, where you can follow the wine over the course of an evening. Only 5 of the 24 bottles showed signs of weakness, with 1 of those already oxidized, but given the substance that could be tasted underneath, this is more likely due to weak corks or poor storage than anything nature delivered this year. All the wines had very good fill levels and had been quickly double decanted before tasting to remove the sediment.

TN: This wine presents a medium expressive bouquet with dark fruit and dense minerality that makes it quite seductive, though not as complex as some of the others in the tasting. The palate is vibrant, with nuances of truffle and tobacco alongside fresh cassis and more dark fruit, underpinned by minerality and herbal notes. It's complex and precise, with well-integrated tannins and a fresh, satiny texture. Of all the wines today, this was the most classically Bordeaux-like in style. And both Diamond Creek wines were the only two wines in the tasting that are not fully mature and would benefit from additional 10 to 20+ years of cellaring. Decanting is recommended if opened now.