Search Results - Save This Search

Wine Type Vintage Name Variety Locale Date Posted Score Helpful Comments Comment Date Community Score More...
Red

2019 WillaKenzie Estate Pinot Noir Estate Yamhill-Carlton

more

2/12/2024 - Giggs wrote: 89 points

Lots of oak, which needs a couple years to integrate. Drinking it today with a couple hours decanting, the oaky brioche and bourbon notes do eventually blow off to reveal ripe cranberry and brown spices. There’s a lot of quality to the presentation but not much complexity, or at least the oak is concealing any complexity that might be hiding underneath. Drink 2026-2030.

  • Comment posted by Giggs:

    4/5/2024 5:13:00 AM - Maybe I should have said try in 2026-2030. The oak needs at least that much time to integrate.

White

2019 Mount Eden Vineyards Chardonnay Santa Cruz Mountains

more

11/18/2022 - Giggs wrote: 87 points

Wines You Dream Of (Miller Gallery, Cincinnati, Ohio): Simple, with lemon-butter creamed corn sort of profile.

  • Comment posted by Giggs:

    8/29/2023 7:31:00 AM - Thanks, Dave! Very Adrian Carsini of you.

  • Comment posted by Giggs:

    8/29/2023 5:57:00 PM - No one’s too young to be a Columbo fan!

Red

2019 Venge Vineyards Cabernet Sauvignon Silencieux

Napa Valley more

4/28/2023 - Giggs wrote: 87 points

Huge CT averages for this wine in every vintage. It tastes like a sweet candy shop—Sweet Tarts?—styled like every grocery store super Cab deemed worthy of an anti-theft neck lock. Imagine a company dinner at the all-American steakhouse chain and the sales director guy orders it with his well-done porterhouse, then passes a glass around the table, “Ya gotta try this!”

  • Comment posted by Giggs:

    4/28/2023 8:11:00 PM - I do love big Cabs, but this doesn’t have the texture, character, or depth of fruit to be worth more points on my scale. It’s not a bad wine, it just comes off as one of those manipulated and mass produced styles that you often find in the $40-$60 Napa range.

Red

2016 Ciacci Piccolomini d'Aragona Brunello di Montalcino Pianrosso

Sangiovese more

11/26/2022 - Giggs wrote: 97 points

Spicy cedar, crushed currants, mushrooms, and olive tapenade on the nose. Medium-bodied palate delivers damson plum jam framed by balsamic and salty, flinty mineral notes. This is not big and brooding—it’s elegant, complex, and precise with good acidity and fine tannins that blend into the background. Ready to drink. 2022-2027

  • Comment posted by Giggs:

    12/2/2022 1:03:00 PM - Hi Stefan, definitely doesn’t need 20 years. It’s already in early maturity with several years of peak drinking ahead. My suggestion would be anytime in the next 5 years with a couple hours’ decanting.

Red

2017 J.L. Chave Sélection St. Joseph Offerus

Syrah more

9/2/2022 - Giggs wrote: 89 points

Opens with a minty, almost garrigue-like herbality to the nose, then you get pencil shavings and buttery chocolate cake aromas that come across as, initially at least, over-manipulated. More air adds incense and floral potpourri. The medium-bodied palate has a plum-skin extract component that gradually evolves into wild plum and black currant. Finishes somewhat rugged and austere—but authentic, which is interesting given how the nose had suggested mass production. Definitely keeps improving with air but hard to pick as a long-term ager. Drink it now.

  • Comment posted by Giggs:

    9/4/2022 7:21:00 PM - Perhaps 6-12 months of bottle age would allow the oak to further integrate and improve the experience. But it doesn’t need time for the usual reasons (acidity and/or tannin).

Red

2016 Keplinger Cabernet Sauvignon Oakville Ranch Vineyard

more

8/13/2021 - Giggs wrote: 94 points

Sensational. Confident yet unpretentious winemaking.

  • Comment posted by Giggs:

    8/14/2021 6:50:00 AM - Lots left, but I don’t think it’s too young. Depends on how mature you prefer. It has elegance that I think plays well in early maturity, so I’d say drink 2022-24 based on this bottle.

Red

2009 Paul Hobbs Pinot Noir Hyde Vineyard

Carneros more

8/15/2014 - Giggs wrote: 93 points

Decanted 45 minutes. Beautiful but tannic. Blueberry and blackberry liqueur nose, ground black slate and graphite mineral, great concentration, presenting more like a Shiraz than a Pinot. The palate picks up some coffee grounds and mocha notes, sweetly ripe purple fruit, yet very dry with a gripping, green, tannic finish. Probably best to wait a couple more years on this. Drink 2016-2020.

  • Comment posted by Giggs:

    9/29/2014 2:11:00 PM - Hi Dave, Your experience is similar to mine. The bottles I drank in 2012 and 2013 were open, expressive, and not overpowered by tannins as my most recent bottle was. I think it's just in a closed-down phase and hopefully will reemerge in a couple years.

Red

1999 Luddite Cellars Shiraz

Barossa more

7/13/2014 - Renot Likes this wine: 91 points

Still very good, but this bottle was not as rich as the last.

  • Comment posted by Giggs:

    7/14/2014 1:07:00 PM - What happened with this bottle? A 12-point downgrade in eight months is surprising. Do you think it's past peak?

  • Comment posted by Giggs:

    7/21/2014 9:33:00 PM - Good news... thanks, Renot. Glad to hear it wasn't a bad bottle. I have three bottles arriving in the fall and am looking forward to trying it. I'll be sure to drink them sooner than later.

Red

2004 Forest Hill Vineyard Cabernet Sauvignon Block 5

Mount Barker more

1/13/2012 - Giggs wrote: 87 points

Bottle purchased in Sydney, 4/2011. Light-framed Cabernet opens with heavy graphite and black olive, black currants, nougat nose. Herbal palate lacks depth of fruit, tea leaf, salty acid, anise, dry wood spice. Biting astringency from 2/3-palate onward. Good complexity but not much flesh to it.

  • Comment posted by Giggs:

    12/30/2013 6:11:00 PM - arthrovine, I had big hopes for this bottle, but it just didn't deliver. It had been stored upright in the shop for who knows how long (screwcap, so it should have been fine). Maybe mine was just a substandard bottle, but it didn't have the power I had hoped for. I suspect it was too old, but this is going off the one experience. I hope you have better luck with yours.

Red

2001 Gralyn Estate Cabernet Sauvignon Reserve 'SBR'

Margaret River more

11/15/2013 - Giggs wrote: 94 points

Decanted briefly. Straight out of the bottle this is heavily marked by oak barrel notes, but fortunately this is less apparent in the glass. Instead, there's strong menthol on the nose with a mix of cassis and chocolate. The palate is herbal, with concentrated red cassis, tangy cranberry, and a some cola. Finishes with cottony tannins. A fun wine to drink. Drink now-2018.

  • Comment posted by Giggs:

    12/30/2013 6:06:00 PM - arthrovine, thanks for the comments. Lucky you got to visit Gralyn...I never got out that far west. I gave the SBR only about 30 minutes in the decanter, but I don't think it needed any more than that. It's not a wine that needs 3-4+ hours decanting, but the oak barrel notes did need some time to blow off. I really enjoyed it...very unique, ripe but still tons of herbal influence. It was like a Napa Cab in a bizarro world universe. There are clear similarities, but the differences make it very exotic, the menthol being the primary thing, and also the intense tangy cranberry. I'm sure you'll enjoy your bottle...it's one of those bottles you could drink whenever. Would have been great to have a case of it.

Red

2000 Château Monbousquet

St. Émilion Grand Cru Red Bordeaux Blend more

11/1/2013 - Giggs wrote: 94 points

Breeders' Cup XXX; 11/1/2013-11/2/2013: Decanted 4 hours. Very masculine nose, lots of Merlot character, alluring, deep black cherry, coffee, and clay. Expansive palate has features similar notes, nice texture to the fruit, still youthful but certainly in its window. Excellent.

  • Comment posted by Giggs:

    11/5/2013 2:36:00 PM - Congrats on the Ria Antonia-Dank double!--it was the right decision on the disqualification. I was big on Beholder in the Distaff... great to see her win, but wish the price had been more generous.

    I agree this was quite an oaky selection of wines, but many do seem to have integrated well. Generally these special occasion wine dinners turn into an arms race for big, full-bodied, in-your-face wines, which accordingly are usually heavily oaked. Fortunately, many pulled it off nicely.

Red

2004 Bodega Numanthia Toro Numanthia

Tinta de Toro, Tempranillo more

11/1/2013 - Giggs wrote: 91 points

Breeders' Cup XXX; 11/1/2013-11/2/2013: Decanted 4 hours. Spicy, cedary nose, the expected heavily-oaked profile, but it doesn't bring the anticipated power. Same on the palate: lacks the power you'd associate with this label. Up front there's good dark fruit edged with black licorice and smoke, but the fruit concentration falls off considerably in late palate and finish. While I don't think this is in a dumb phase, I do think a few more years will improve it by letting some of the oak integrate.

  • Comment posted by Giggs:

    11/4/2013 2:27:00 PM - Harley1199: Yes, it's an interesting one. My prediction would be somewhere around 2017 will see it drinking nicely, the thinking being that the oak will have receded just enough to balance with the maximum amount of fruit. That being said, as others here have noted, it's presently an overrated wine. I hope your winery tasting proves to be insightful!

Red

2001 E. Guigal Côte-Rôtie La Landonne

Syrah more

7/9/2013 - NostraBacchus Likes this wine: 99 points

Tasted blind. OMG!!! Mind-blowing nose of blackberries, black currant, licorice, flowers, tobacco, graphite/earth and pepper. On the palate, there are again waves of fruit and an incredible aromatic complexity. Full-bodied, but with no impression of heaviness at all, medium-high tannins and medium-high acidity. Incredibly long. This is one of most complex wines I have had in a long time. It's huge, but at the same time stunningly elegant and has tons of finesse. I absolutely loved this wine!

  • Comment posted by Giggs:

    7/10/2013 2:00:00 PM - Awesome review--was the wine decanted? If so, how long? What kind of drinking window would you give it? Thanks!

Red

2005 Zanzibar Cellars Sandra Alder Creek Vineyard

Horse Heaven Hills Red Blend more

3/4/2013 - LexTom Likes this wine: 89 points

Second time around for this wine, with somewhat different nose and palate. ... Still very grapey to nose but fruit seemed more bitter. ... Nose of chalkboard, wood fire, and eucalyptus. ... Strong palate sweeter than nose with a very even finish. Slightly lower rating this time but still a nice drinking wine.

  • Comment posted by Giggs:

    4/28/2013 8:28:00 PM - Butterscotch ... cherries ... not offensive ... more cherries ... nothing offensive in any way .... cherries.

Red

2005 Clos Apalta

Red Bordeaux Blend more

4/14/2013 - Win-E Likes this wine: 93 points

N: fresh ripe black cherries and currant, licorice
P: figs and prunes and dates. Interesting fruit profile. Well balanced with complexity but a little fruit forward. Nice now and layers of favors apparent. Long finish. Higher alcohol and can use some time in cellar

  • Comment posted by Giggs:

    4/28/2013 1:09:00 PM - Abbreviating "nose" and "palate" must really save time writing tasting notes.

Red

2004 Seña

Aconcagua Valley Red Bordeaux Blend more

12/12/2007 - win wrote: 93 points

If you truly want to get a sense of this wine, read the prior reviews by vinho and losvinhos in Spanish. I wish my 4 years of Spanish in school served me better. Amazing wine -- very surprised by it. Carlisle meets a refined Bordeaux. Not sure how it will age, but my guess is that is has quite a bit of time in front of it. I'm buying in a little quantity to find out. Hold for a few years.

  • Comment posted by Giggs:

    3/31/2013 9:55:00 PM - Those reviews are in Portuguese.

Red

2001 Poderi Aldo Conterno Barolo Cicala

Nebbiolo more

3/26/2013 - pikemasterflash wrote: 92 points

Quite tannic upon opening and throughout. I felt like this could use more time to mellow, if that is possible. There was definitely an underlying grapy fruit nose that was immediately evident. I might be a bit biased on the downside here but I probably prefer a BdM.

  • Comment posted by Giggs:

    3/26/2013 8:09:00 PM - If you didn't decant this wine for at least a few hours, I don't think you gave it a fair chance. Also, stylistically it's very different from a Brunello.

Red

1998 Wild Duck Creek Shiraz Springflat

Heathcote more

11/2/2010 - Screameagle wrote: 92 points

Wow, this bottle was drinking great. The previous poster is right on. I've consumed some good and some not so good '98 Wild Duck shiraz. Happy to have one bottle left.

  • Comment posted by Giggs:

    3/14/2013 9:45:00 PM - Have you tried your last bottle yet? Curious to hear your thoughts because I just bought a few bottles.

  • Comment posted by Giggs:

    3/15/2013 8:15:00 AM - Thanks. I actually called the winemaker, Liam, yesterday and asked him about the wine. Really nice guy. He said he hadn't had the 1998 in a couple years, but that it was "on the way up" when he had it, and that a friend of his in Hong Kong tried the wine last month and said it was drinking awesome.

Red

2000 Cartoixa de Montsalvat Priorat Montsalvat

Red Blend more

1/13/2008 - SacredCow wrote: 88 points

Same rating as the last bottle. The middle has filled out, and there is now some spiciness throughout the wine. A little more tar on the palate this time.

  • Comment posted by Giggs:

    3/14/2013 8:48:00 PM - SacredCow: Have you had any more of these? How are they drinking? I just bought nine bottles, so I'm curious...

Red

1998 Romano Dal Forno Amarone della Valpolicella Vigneto di Monte Lodoletta

Corvina Blend, Corvina more

1/15/2013 - rjonwine@gmail.com Likes this wine: 99 points

White Burgundy, Barolo, Brunello, Amarone Feast (Caffe Macaroni): Opaque red violet color; rich chocolate, dried fig, chocolate syrup nose; rich, delicious, chocolate, chocolate syrup, hazelnut, licorice palate; very long finish

  • Comment posted by Giggs:

    2/14/2013 8:21:00 PM - Thanks, Richard. What's the best drinking window for this wine? Do you recommend a decant?--if so, how long?

Red

1992 Yalumba Shiraz The Octavius

Barossa Valley more

6/4/2012 - Gazonator wrote: 97 points

Are You Kidding Me!!.....Yalumbas third ever vintage of Octavius....20 years old and WHAM. 8 is Enough wine tasting group had just swirled down a 2002 Yalumbe Reserve and were in Nirvana. The Octavius was also decanted for 2 hours. The nose was incredible, a powerful, spicey plums and black berry aroma Cigar Box,oak and cloves...WOW. Then the tasting...well, this is where GOD lives!. Yep... sitting in a barrell of 92' octavius. Powerful fruit with smooth balanced tannin and oak. This is a Masculine wine...full bodied and fully ripped...but yet elegant and soft with a long finish...how the winemaker achieved this is a true reflection of his ability. Cripes it was gooooood

  • Comment posted by Giggs:

    1/3/2013 9:29:00 PM - Thanks for the great review. See my review above. Much appreciated!

Red

2001 The Standish Wine Company Shiraz The Standish

Barossa Valley more

12/22/2012 - mcubed Likes this wine: 94 points

Just an outstanding wine. Needs a long time to breathe. Once open, there are layers of flavors from nose to finish.

  • Comment posted by Giggs:

    12/23/2012 1:45:00 PM - Did you decant it? How long before it was drinking its best?

Loading wine details...
loading

×
×