1967 Château Léoville Barton

Community Tasting Notes

Community Tasting Notes (13) Avg Score: 88.4 points

  • Just a great treat for friend and I. Surprising still has life to it. Cork was in excellent shape. Some forest floor notes and light cigar box still apparent. Really enjoyable .

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • An upper shoulder bottle bought several months ago in auction along with a '70. I was going to keep it until 2017 but despite a good label the corroded capsule and slightly pushed out cork made me decide the sooner the better. I needn't have worried as the cork came out in one with the butlers friend and the perfume filled the room. I knew immediately that I was in for a treat. 1967 was a light and beautifully balanced flavorful vintage and I drank quite a number of them in the 80's and 90's; including Petrus and Latour. Latour was the best of the left bank and I'd love to find a bottle at a sensible price - I used to pay £50! Dream on. Colour is light brick orange, perfume that puts many a Ch Margaux to shame, body light but impeccably balanced with fully resolved tannins that still provide just the right amount of backbone. Long and moreish finish. A remarkable survivor and well kept bottles will live another decade without recorking. Chapeau to Anthony Barton for the quality of cork used in an under rated vintage. From a technical perspective the score would be 90 but emotionally, for the memory and most importantly sheer enjoyment I'd give 95 plus. You can't put a number on a wine like this. P.s. opened to celebrate the agreement to buy a beautiful AMV8.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • BBQ late Jul 2020: medium-high shoulder fill; cork could be pulled as one piece; dark raspberry juice like color; in the nose red cherries and berries mingled with a TCA-like flavor; in the mouth TCA-like notes, while the wine showed a nice juicyness and crisp acidity on the palate; light body.

    Sadly this LB 1967 bottle was at the end of his lifespan. However, flawed bottles always offer interesting wine teaching experiences.

    TCA = 2,4,6-trichloro anisole

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Drank at 67
    A beautiful faded treasure.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Medium dark purple color, not much nose. Light tannins, thin fruit, obviously well past prime but still drinking fine. Still some life left, barely but still there.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Aaaaahhhh. The '67 experience. More of a bad acid trip than a smooth reefer high. Funky nose of mushrooms and moss. Sour cherry and flint mouth. The finish is decent but very tart. This is way over the hill; however, is drinkable. Cool experience for $30.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • I was happy with this given that it was a total experiment. I picked it up on wine bid for $20 with the expectation that it was probably over the hill - but, if it was drinkable, great. Well, it was certainly drinkable - even enjoyable. The nose was sweet and small. The palate was thin but focused with prune, leather and a bit of earth....no funk....even in the beginning. It was fun to google 1967 and chat with my wife about what was happening in the world that year while drinking the bottle. Well worth it!

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • This wine was in good condition, perhaps past its very best, but still highly drinkable. Like some of the other reviews, it was lighter than some contemporary Bordeaux, with Burgundy affinities. However, it was extremely pleasant on the palate. The nose was surprisingly subdued, but the taste still had tannins, and I thoroughly enjoyed it.

    Being British, I think the Parker point scale is a bit silly; I would give it about four stars.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Light in color, bright, fresh, with lots of spicy red fruit and acid. Some folks thought this was more like Burgundy than Bdx, and I can see that. None of the leather, dried fruit, tobacco so often in older bdx. I don't think this is at the end of its life, and I would love to have another bottle. A lot of fun.

    Opened before the 1982 Bdx at dinner at house.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Dinner at Chez DrVP Dietz: I was really enjoying this although it is fragile. Smelled like Bordeaux while looking, tasting and feeling like an old simple Burgundy. This is a wine to enjoy with food.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Classic Bordeaux and California Cabs (Casa Dietz - Santa Ana, CA): This wine was clearly past its prime, but that is not to say it had completely lost its merits. Fading notes of mushrooms, white cherries, tobacco, and slate. A short, tart, and gasping finish.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Old Bordeaux and Cali Cabs at Dietz's (Chez Dietz): Very light in color for a Bordeaux even of this age. Terrific dusty nose with notes of cedar, forest and red apples. Soft, lean, tart palate also surprisingly shows apples. More Burgundy like on the palate than Bordeaux. Past peak but still enjoyable especially for the nose. Would make a great dinner companion for some pork.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • great bottle.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

What Do You Think? Add a Tasting Note

×
×