Advertisement

Who Likes This Wine(7)

  1. Motz

    Motz

    13,082 Tasting Notes

  2. Ruddyone

    Ruddyone

    1 Tasting Note

  3. ShaneTierney

    ShaneTierney

    61 Tasting Notes

More

Food Pairing Tags

Add My Food Pairing Tags

Community Tasting Notes (11) Avg Score: 93 points

  • Tasted alongside the 2017.

    Gorgeous perfume of blue and purple fruits and berries, thick petal flowers, late summer potpourri, berry liqueurs, mint, sous bois, and complex earthiness. Minimal alcohol intrusiveness. Sophisticated, layered, intriguing.

    The wine tastes like it smells, in inflection changing waves. Harmonious at all phases. The elegance masks impressive structure. Deep and satisfying finish.

    All elements point to an optimal drinking window after 2040. No reason not to sample bottles now and there is an upside. Higher quality than the 2017. 95-96.

    1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

  • Of course deepest opaque black purple…
    Cassis blackberry nose..alcohol whiff…thick unctuous body and legs
    Deep blueberry, cassis, oak, but surprising acidic lift …
    Not sweet and cloying…
    Very nice port..

    1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

  • #3 Cata Amics Porreres - Port; 4/15/2023-4/17/2023: 🧐APPEARANCE🧐 -
    🌡️Intensity🌡️- Deep
    🔴Colour (Red)🔴 - Ruby

    👃🏼NOSE👃🏼 -
    🌡️Intensity🌡️ - Pronnounced
    🌺Floral🌺 - Rose
    🍓Red fruit🍓 - Redcurrant,Cherry,Strawberry,Cranberry
    ☘️Herbal☘️ - Mint
    🪵Oak🪵 - Vanilla,Clove
    🍇Fruit development (Red)🍇 - Fig,Prune,Dried fruit
    ⚱️Bottle age (Red)⚱️ - Forest floor,Earth

    👅PALATE👅 -
    🍬Sweetness🍬 - Sweet
    🧪Acidity🧪 - Medium (+)
    🧬Tannin🧬 - High
    🥴Alcohol🥴 - High
    🏋Body🏋 - Full
    🌡️Flavour intensity🌡️ - Pronnounced
    🏁Finish🏁 - Long

    🔚CONCLUSIONS🔜 -🗡EPIC🗡 - 4
    🇶 Quality 🇶 - Outstanding
    ✅Readiness✅ - Can drink now, but has potential of ageing. Actually a bit too young still.
    💯Personal score💯 - 95

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Good tannins. Not too sweet.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Decanted 48 hours. Tasted blind alongside '17 Cockburn VP, '16 & '17 Dow VP, '16 & '17 Taylor's VP.
    Thicker and darker fruit than both Dow's, not as muscular as either Taylor's, and with a shorter finish.
    The 2016 Cockburn had more spice and earthiness, slightly less balanced fruit, slightly longer finish than the 2017 Cockburn.
    Excellent, but weaker than the competitors.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

View all 11 Community Tasting Notes

What Do You Think? Add a Tasting Note

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.

Vinous

  • By Neal Martin
    Vintage Port – The 2016 Declaration (Jun 2018), 6/18/2018, (See more on Vinous...)

    (Cockburn’s Vintage Port Fortified/spirits) Login and sign up and see review text.

Decanter

JamesSuckling.com

JancisRobinson.com

NOTE: Some content is property of Vinous and Decanter and JamesSuckling.com and JancisRobinson.com.

Add a Pro Review Add Your Own Reviews:
 

Advertisement

×