Probably needed more air. Still big and structured. Quite tight and closed. At the dark fruit end of the spectrum. Most thought 10 years old so we’re surprised when they heard it’s 18 years. This has a long way to go. From GLT
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Opened 5 hours ahead (3 hours in the decanter). Dark complex red & black cherry bouquet. Still big, dense, intense fruit, but more refined than the last time I had this wine 5 years ago. Some earthiness. In a very good place, and not in decline. This was more drinkable on opening compared to the 2006 Faiveley Mazis drunk alongside, but it improved steadily over 2-hours drinking. 93+
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Red and black cherry fruit with touch of wood and earth notes. The palate’s best quality is the finesse combined with flavour intensity that carries to a lingering finish. Classy all the way. Drank over three days and it kept getting better. Very good now but will get better.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Showing a little age and development, but still pretty structured and probably just at the beginning of its window. Big, spicy nose. Liked this quite a bit.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
medium red color just starting to brick at the rim, on the nose plums and cherries with a still noticeable presence of spicy oak, on the palate a very textured wine and quite deep (for Charmes) with red and black fruits showing well but still in development, excellent highly aromatic finish with intense spices- notably clove, given the sheer size and generosity of the fruit in the best 2005s this is deceptively good now- but I think a good deal of nuance is yet to come as it begins to unfurl, the structure here is rather firm and this may end up ever so slightly rustic or dusty on the finish in time, but overall I think there is a very good future ahead here.
*(***), 2025++
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
4/5/2023 - _water.into.wine_ Likes this wine: 92 Points
Probably needed more air. Still big and structured. Quite tight and closed. At the dark fruit end of the spectrum. Most thought 10 years old so we’re surprised when they heard it’s 18 years. This has a long way to go. From GLT
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
2/11/2023 - aChave Likes this wine: 93 Points
Opened 5 hours ahead (3 hours in the decanter). Dark complex red & black cherry bouquet. Still big, dense, intense fruit, but more refined than the last time I had this wine 5 years ago. Some earthiness. In a very good place, and not in decline. This was more drinkable on opening compared to the 2006 Faiveley Mazis drunk alongside, but it improved steadily over 2-hours drinking. 93+
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
5/11/2022 - Milos Likes this wine: 93 Points
Red and black cherry fruit with touch of wood and earth notes. The palate’s best quality is the finesse combined with flavour intensity that carries to a lingering finish. Classy all the way. Drank over three days and it kept getting better. Very good now but will get better.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
6/20/2021 - B Paul wrote:
Showing a little age and development, but still pretty structured and probably just at the beginning of its window. Big, spicy nose. Liked this quite a bit.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
6/18/2021 - Elpaninaro Likes this wine:
medium red color just starting to brick at the rim, on the nose plums and cherries with a still noticeable presence of spicy oak, on the palate a very textured wine and quite deep (for Charmes) with red and black fruits showing well but still in development, excellent highly aromatic finish with intense spices- notably clove, given the sheer size and generosity of the fruit in the best 2005s this is deceptively good now- but I think a good deal of nuance is yet to come as it begins to unfurl, the structure here is rather firm and this may end up ever so slightly rustic or dusty on the finish in time, but overall I think there is a very good future ahead here.
*(***), 2025++
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment