This wine is my archilles heel. I chanced upon their youtube video and i was really impressed by the entire short documentary. And the fact ferregamo bought it, the fact they got 99 points by JS plus its situated on a majestic mountaintop. I rem as i poured out the wine, i remember a nice swirling consistentence and a colour that beams. But alas as i took the first gulp and then second gulp, i was abit taken aback that the taste really came across as just normal…. Nothing out of the spectrum and i wasn’t floored by the experience and needless to say i struggled with understanding how it got 99 points? Not here to throw rocks because i actually bought 4 more bottles of 2015 and 3 more 2016 subsequently to probably convince myself otherwise? Hence i am curious does anyone have any similar experience like me? Or what am i actually missing out?
Clean modern lines approaching maturity. Teak, tart cherry, strawberry, rose, leather, charcoal. Probably five years from peak but drinking great now with a little air. The charcoal really adds a nice bass note.
6 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
(Castiglion del Bosco Brunello di Montalcino, Italy) Login and sign up and see review text.
NOTE: Some content is property of Vinous and WineAlign and JancisRobinson.com and View From the Cellar and Decanter and JebDunnuck.com and JamesSuckling.com.
4/28/2024 - MitchellChan wrote:
This wine is my archilles heel. I chanced upon their youtube video and i was really impressed by the entire short documentary. And the fact ferregamo bought it, the fact they got 99 points by JS plus its situated on a majestic mountaintop. I rem as i poured out the wine, i remember a nice swirling consistentence and a colour that beams. But alas as i took the first gulp and then second gulp, i was abit taken aback that the taste really came across as just normal…. Nothing out of the spectrum and i wasn’t floored by the experience and needless to say i struggled with understanding how it got 99 points? Not here to throw rocks because i actually bought 4 more bottles of 2015 and 3 more 2016 subsequently to probably convince myself otherwise? Hence i am curious does anyone have any similar experience like me? Or what am i actually missing out?
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comments (6)
4/11/2024 - Portland Seth Likes this wine: 92 Points
Clean modern lines approaching maturity. Teak, tart cherry, strawberry, rose, leather, charcoal. Probably five years from peak but drinking great now with a little air. The charcoal really adds a nice bass note.
6 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
2/9/2024 - 1961Vintage Likes this wine: 92 Points
Notes consistent with previous posts. Very enjoyable wine.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
2/3/2024 - IvanLi Likes this wine: 93 Points
Automatically very pleasant: red fruit, spices, wood. Acidic and a bit austere on the palate. Probably needs more time.
2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
2/3/2024 - gnsti wrote: 91 Points
두엄향으로 시작
잠시후 체리, 베리류, 자두, 무화과의 풍부한 과실향
좋은 산미에 깨끗하고 맑은 느낌의 질감
너무 부드러운 타닌, 미디엄 바디
좋았지만 팔렛이 살짝 부족하다고 느꼈다.
다른 와인들에 살짝 묻힌느낌도.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment