Advertisement

Who Likes This Wine(4)

  1. WEB,III

    WEB,III

    2,489 Tasting Notes

  2. wineforth

    wineforth

    937 Tasting Notes

  3. Matt Neel

    Matt Neel

    470 Tasting Notes

More

Food Pairing Tags

Add My Food Pairing Tags

Community Tasting Notes (17) Avg Score: 90 points

  • Quite fragrant on the nose; a mid-red colour; medium to full on the palate, which is savoury and tasting mature, but with a dryish finish. Perhaps not grand cru quality, but very good and suitable for current drinking.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • A fairly deep colour, garnet with some brown. The wine is now probably as good as it ever will be, with quite rich fruit, somewhat savoury and with a hint of violets. The tannin is mostly resolved and the wine is now mature. A fine bottle.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Double blind. This is more wood than wine. The nose is all oak and while the palate mostly just creates a nice luge to slide the wine down your through, the finish has harsh oak tannins that are nowhere near integrating. Unpleasant to drink, and in a vintage like 2006 I have a hard time believing this will ever integrate. I think I called this a 2015 on account that it shows no age and refused to call a village because how would I know where the trees are from?

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Day 1: Quite a dense, burly wine, but lacking a little charm. It tastes mature but may soften up further given more time. Perhaps 89/100.

    Day 2: This is much improved. It has a bright, mid-red colour; the fruit has softened and is quite intense and long; it is still perhaps a bit burly, but it is a wine of substance and now just about ready.

    Overall: Perhaps not really grand cru quality, but still a very good wine which will probably still benefit from more time.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Mid-red/garnet colour; red fruit flavours, cherry and raspberry, and some more vegetal character. Reasonable depth but a little solid and lacking charm. Quite a sturdy wine, but not particularly elegant and not really grand cru quality.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

View all 17 Community Tasting Notes

What Do You Think? Add a Tasting Note

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.

Vinous

  • By Stephen Tanzer
    March/April 2008, IWC Issue #137, (See more on Vinous...)

    (Nicolas Potel Echezeaux) Login and sign up and see review text.

JancisRobinson.com

Burghound

Burgundy-Report

  • By Bill Nanson
    4/1/2008, (See more on Burgundy-Report...)

    (Potel Nicolas Echézeaux) There is real depth on the nose - like the Gaudichots. More tannin providing extra texture, but there is a more open display of flavour over the palate. Showing much better than any of the Vosne Crus.

NOTE: Some content is property of Vinous and JancisRobinson.com and Burghound and Burgundy-Report.

Add a Pro Review Add Your Own Reviews:
 

Advertisement

×