From 375. Drank during a broad pinot phase, mostly California. This doesn't quite measure up to mid to high end Cal pinots. Good but a bit tart/acidic for my tastes. Not at all over the hill, but don't think it's getting any better.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
A bit inelegant? Sure. But personally I didn’t find this to be thin or short. Very earthy, and definitely showing the ferrous streak mentioned below, with plenty of pleasant black cherry fruit. Nicely open and in a good spot, though it can certainly go longer.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
PopnPour, tasted over 1 hr, from 375 mL -minimal bricking -reticent faded earthy dark fruit and an interesting citrus element -med/med+ acidity gives a brisk edge to the similarly dark fruit iron and citrusy palate that is more expressive than the nose and accompanied by a pixy stix-like candied dried cherry aspect, med somewhat coarse tannins -really quite decent with some burly NSG typicity, probably in a prime drinking window now but even in this format should have several years before significant decline
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Day 1: Thin/short. Red fruit, iron, on the flat side. Decent acidity, a bit leaden. Worked with food but uninteresting and inelegant otherwise. Day 2: Really quite nice for a villages -- red fruit has filled in, finish smooth, light but a bit more body than previously, quite pretty, silky texture. Day 1 was an 86 but day 2 an 89 -- so the lesson is, (exceptionally for a burgundy) decant or wait a few more years.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
2/26/2021 - levinml wrote: 89 Points
From 375. Drank during a broad pinot phase, mostly California. This doesn't quite measure up to mid to high end Cal pinots. Good but a bit tart/acidic for my tastes. Not at all over the hill, but don't think it's getting any better.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
10/11/2020 - winchester-xi Likes this wine:
A bit inelegant? Sure. But personally I didn’t find this to be thin or short. Very earthy, and definitely showing the ferrous streak mentioned below, with plenty of pleasant black cherry fruit. Nicely open and in a good spot, though it can certainly go longer.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
1/25/2018 - Cote d'Or wrote:
PopnPour, tasted over 1 hr, from 375 mL
-minimal bricking
-reticent faded earthy dark fruit and an interesting citrus element
-med/med+ acidity gives a brisk edge to the similarly dark fruit iron and citrusy palate that is more expressive than the nose and accompanied by a pixy stix-like candied dried cherry aspect, med somewhat coarse tannins
-really quite decent with some burly NSG typicity, probably in a prime drinking window now but even in this format should have several years before significant decline
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
8/21/2017 - levinml wrote: 89 Points
Similar to other $40-50/btl pinots. Perfectly good, light, fruity and a hair acidic. Nothing bad, but just not the great experience one hopes for.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
11/15/2015 - ccn wrote: 89 Points
Day 1: Thin/short. Red fruit, iron, on the flat side. Decent acidity, a bit leaden. Worked with food but uninteresting and inelegant otherwise. Day 2: Really quite nice for a villages -- red fruit has filled in, finish smooth, light but a bit more body than previously, quite pretty, silky texture. Day 1 was an 86 but day 2 an 89 -- so the lesson is, (exceptionally for a burgundy) decant or wait a few more years.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment