Pristine bottle last night, absolutely nothing tired or maderized about it. PNP, was ready to go right out of the gates. Shockingly lively nose, so much fruit. And more fruit. A complex array of apples and pears, perfectly balanced with mineral and white flowers, gorgeous acidity and fine bubbles.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
My bottle was lively, a good amount of many fine bubbles. Suprised because the 88 and 89 i opened was not to good at all. The 88 and 89 has more body and darker aromas with unfortunately maderisation. This wine is more crisp and clean, much acid but has a rather short aftertaste.
The cork was weak and almost slided out with a small fizz. This champagne was crisp, pure and fresh. Tastes younger than its real vintage. On a blind i would have tought it was from the middle 90s. The acid is high but the aftertaste is quite short.
Taste includes: clean fresh green and small amount of red apples, citrus, small amount of brioche. The taste is tight and you can really chew the wine in your mouth!
I was suprised the 1985 is still kicking. Without a doubt the best bottle of a 39 year old champagne I ever tried.
Highly reccomended bottle!
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Magnum, served blind next to 90M. Crazy young, even better than the bottle tasted last month, with air showing floral, vanilla, brioche and delicate orange acidity all in graceful balance. 94+
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
4/10/2024 - broccoliflower Likes this wine: 97 Points
Pristine bottle last night, absolutely nothing tired or maderized about it. PNP, was ready to go right out of the gates. Shockingly lively nose, so much fruit. And more fruit. A complex array of apples and pears, perfectly balanced with mineral and white flowers, gorgeous acidity and fine bubbles.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
4/4/2024 - StiGGe wrote: 93 Points
My bottle was lively, a good amount of many fine bubbles. Suprised because the 88 and 89 i opened was not to good at all. The 88 and 89 has more body and darker aromas with unfortunately maderisation. This wine is more crisp and clean, much acid but has a rather short aftertaste.
The cork was weak and almost slided out with a small fizz. This champagne was crisp, pure and fresh. Tastes younger than its real vintage. On a blind i would have tought it was from the middle 90s. The acid is high but the aftertaste is quite short.
Taste includes: clean fresh green and small amount of red apples, citrus, small amount of brioche. The taste is tight and you can really chew the wine in your mouth!
I was suprised the 1985 is still kicking. Without a doubt the best bottle of a 39 year old champagne I ever tried.
Highly reccomended bottle!
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
3/20/2024 - Ben Christiansen wrote:
Old, and certainly a touch maderized, but always fun to find a buried bone.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
11/25/2023 - RayOB wrote: 93 Points
Drank in London
Fresh and alive
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
9/4/2023 - hprphf wrote: 95 Points
Magnum, served blind next to 90M. Crazy young, even better than the bottle tasted last month, with air showing floral, vanilla, brioche and delicate orange acidity all in graceful balance. 94+
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment