Double decanted an hour before drinking, doesn't look to have aged with firm deep colour at the rim. All leather and tobacco on the nose which carries through to the mouth. Still firm tannins at 15 years, this gives every sign of having plenty of legs yet. Drank over 4 hours during and after coq au vin and it didn't change much at all. Enjoyable but I had hoped it might soften and be more approachable after a few hours. The only bottle I had and I doubt I will ever see another 97, shame as another 5 years would a good review point.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Was looking forward to this, but it never really got going. Very Bordeaux like in structure, but for a Chilean wine, its lacking in fruit. There is a bit of texture in the mouth, some peper and earth, but its rather dull and fades away quickly. Never improved in the glass and although it is perfectly drinkable, you expect a lot more given its price.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Il est devenu l'ombre de ce qu'il a été il y a quelques années à peine. Notes de pruneaux et de tabac. Bouche aux tanins devenus un peu secs. Il est quand même bien, mais il fait regretter de ne pas l'avoir ouvert plus tôt, lorsqu'il était à son apogée.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
6/23/2017 - 911carrera wrote: 87 Points
Very smooth but nothing spectacular. Past prime but an enjoyable drink nonetheless.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
9/16/2012 - Templegrafton wrote: 89 Points
Double decanted an hour before drinking, doesn't look to have aged with firm deep colour at the rim. All leather and tobacco on the nose which carries through to the mouth. Still firm tannins at 15 years, this gives every sign of having plenty of legs yet. Drank over 4 hours during and after coq au vin and it didn't change much at all. Enjoyable but I had hoped it might soften and be more approachable after a few hours. The only bottle I had and I doubt I will ever see another 97, shame as another 5 years would a good review point.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
4/5/2010 - mychurch wrote: 81 Points
Was looking forward to this, but it never really got going. Very Bordeaux like in structure, but for a Chilean wine, its lacking in fruit. There is a bit of texture in the mouth, some peper and earth, but its rather dull and fades away quickly. Never improved in the glass and although it is perfectly drinkable, you expect a lot more given its price.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
1/5/2009 - bkarney wrote: 89 Points
Drink them now if you still have some. Drank with the 99 and I actually believe the 97 held up better but both are past their prime.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
9/6/2008 - Partenaire wrote: 85 Points
Il est devenu l'ombre de ce qu'il a été il y a quelques années à peine. Notes de pruneaux et de tabac. Bouche aux tanins devenus un peu secs. Il est quand même bien, mais il fait regretter de ne pas l'avoir ouvert plus tôt, lorsqu'il était à son apogée.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment