Still holding on, some freshness to the reticent red fruit, balsamic, earth and energy. Fairly resolved tannin with medium plus, folded in and not astringent. It’s a pure expression of Nebbiolo. Very nice standard Barolo
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Barolo 96-04 Theme lunch at Nicolas. Tasted semi-blind. Appearance is clear, deep intensity, ruby garnet colour. Legs. Nose full of VA and underlying violet and dark cherries and spice. Palate getting increasingly muted and suggestion of TCA taint. Ultimately, VA notes dominate.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Aromas of rosewood, tar, and dried rosepetals greet the nose. Fairly aromatic for a pop and pour with simmering reed cherry fruit lurking below.
Round, almost plump still with firm tannins underpinning lots of red cherry fruit, big volume on the backend and through the long finish. A bit indistinct, and to be clear I am drinking the dregs here, but this has lots of fruit left, lots of tannins, a fine mouth feel, modest complexity and little nuance but rather intense, rustic, and valid expression on Nebbiolo.
At the 4 hour mark this remains a bit reticent on the nose with stone and soil notes dominating what gentle burnt cherry fruit there is. Rather smooth and rich on entry, a powerful little bugger, tightly knit, still tannic but with a minty tone on the long fruity buy indistinct finish. Lovely tannins though. Dense with good minty cough medicine cherry fruit that emerges on the backend and powers the finish. This could improve with time, but like the Echezeaux, I think this is better consumed over the next 5 years while the fruit is still intact, tannins be damned. I don’t think there’s enough substance here for magic to happen.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
10/3/2023 - yossarian.livez wrote: 91 Points
Still holding on, some freshness to the reticent red fruit, balsamic, earth and energy. Fairly resolved tannin with medium plus, folded in and not astringent. It’s a pure expression of Nebbiolo. Very nice standard Barolo
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
1/7/2023 - par361 Likes this wine: 92 Points
This still has plenty of time left
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
7/8/2022 - Derek Darth Taster wrote: flawed
Barolo 96-04 Theme lunch at Nicolas. Tasted semi-blind.
Appearance is clear, deep intensity, ruby garnet colour. Legs.
Nose full of VA and underlying violet and dark cherries and spice. Palate getting increasingly muted and suggestion of TCA taint.
Ultimately, VA notes dominate.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
1/24/2022 - Gregory Dal Piaz wrote: 90 Points
Aromas of rosewood, tar, and dried rosepetals greet the nose. Fairly aromatic for a pop and pour with simmering reed cherry fruit lurking below.
Round, almost plump still with firm tannins underpinning lots of red cherry fruit, big volume on the backend and through the long finish. A bit indistinct, and to be clear I am drinking the dregs here, but this has lots of fruit left, lots of tannins, a fine mouth feel, modest complexity and little nuance but rather intense, rustic, and valid expression on Nebbiolo.
At the 4 hour mark this remains a bit reticent on the nose with stone and soil notes dominating what gentle burnt cherry fruit there is. Rather smooth and rich on entry, a powerful little bugger, tightly knit, still tannic but with a minty tone on the long fruity buy indistinct finish. Lovely tannins though. Dense with good minty cough medicine cherry fruit that emerges on the backend and powers the finish. This could improve with time, but like the Echezeaux, I think this is better consumed over the next 5 years while the fruit is still intact, tannins be damned. I don’t think there’s enough substance here for magic to happen.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
1/9/2022 - mmariani wrote:
Still excellent ... refined
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment