French Embassy
Tasted Friday, January 11, 2019 by PanosKakaviatos with 349 views
After an annual holiday dinner with dear wine loving pals - this year at the French embassy - the overriding theme was "good" vintages. Neither off nor great, vintages that sometimes get overlooked by official critics seeking to obtain fame with 100 point scores. And to some extent, lesser known wines that official critics did not see coming. So, read on!
Love how the Rauzan-Ségla showed but the Léoville Barton was better, if not by as much as expected. We should have nursed these just a bit longer.
Of course the 1978 was lovely. You know, 1970s Bordeaux can be surprisingly good ...
Today these bottles cost a fortune, but we were lucky to enjoy no less than three over dinner, served blind and again in a surprising manner to underscore how people can underrate good vintages. The temperature of the wines was quite cold, as they were kept near a half open window, so the structure was more prominent to the point where Ken Brown guessed 2005. We all sensed quite a bit of ripeness, especially for wine number one, and imagined a solar vintage but balanced, too, so along the lines of 2002. I was thinking maybe 1999. As it turned out, all were 2003s! Some of them obtained less than flattering scores from critics. Over dinner, they were very good indeed.
It was great to see wine pals Chris Bublitz, Ken Barr, Karl Kellar, Ken Brown, Charles Stewart, Scot Hasselman, David Zimmerman, Howard Cooper and Paul Marquardt. Thanks for such nice bottles that they brought!
And special thanks to Ken Brown for organizing this shindig at the French embassy, and kudos to Max Jacquet and his team at Le Cafe Descartes, the French Embassy restaurant, for a fine dinner to go with the wines, and in such a lovely setting: a great way to kick off 2019.
2002 Dom Pérignon Champagne 93 Points
France, Champagne
A far better showing than what I had experienced in November last year, which may have been a less than top bottle? In any case, the wine here is lovely, tight and elegant. Indeed, there is a vivacity that seems contained and beckons a bit more time in your cellar. Now, having written this, it was quite revealing to have enjoyed this once again along with the Taittinger Comtes de Champagne 1996, which again revealed itself as superior to the Dom 2002. Given the pricing, it is oh so clear that the latter was a better buy than the Dom Perignon.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
1996 Taittinger Champagne Comtes de Champagne Blanc de Blancs Brut 96 Points
France, Champagne
Once again this 1996 shows such brightness and length, such depth and focus. It is just hard to put into words how refined this wine is. Some burgeoning tertiary aspects, but still rather youthful overall. Much more to it that the Dom Perignon 2002 preceding.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue