Surprisingly good -- better than my last bottle. Too bad it was the last one. The wine looks garnet colored. There is no sediment in the bottle. It smells like red currant.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Earth and goat-y notes to the nose. A very stone-y expression on the nose. A little band-aid aroma and that follows very quietly to the palate. Very mineral and a little grassy/sous-bois, but still very fresh and even less evolved than the 1999 Chardonnay. Very much a Burg express, as opposed to CA. Again, still 3+ years ahead of fine drankin'.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
This was an interesting pour alongside a 91 Echez. Normally I wouldn't think of Hanzell as a big wine but this definitely showed more richness and meat on the bone than the side by side '91 Burg. Very enjoyable. I detect a bit a bit of brown sugar creeping in which makes me think this should be drank up within next year or so. That said, I only recently acquired this and can't attest to its provenance. The btl and cork were pristine though.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
PNP... I'm largely in agreement with twoamps notes of exactly a month ago. I would say though that I enjoyed this more, closer to release. We had tasted this wine at the winery with Bob's assistant winemaker and it was very pretty way back then. That said, today its still very interesting with its tertiary flavors but perhaps on the downward slope. I have one more left and I plan to drink that one very soon too. In fairness though this was a more recent acquisition and I can't vouch for its past storage. The cork was pretty soaked up.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
nicely aged. Earthy and leatherly, but just enough. Still great pinot fruit, just a bit more mellow than new. Oddly, liked much better than earlier bottles.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Chef Nita's Tasting Menu (Craig's House): Tasted blind; I pegged this as a California Pinot and guessed Rhys or Littorai. Nose of woodsmoke/campfire that leads to sweet, heady flavors of dark fruit, baking spice, forest floor, and oak. Finishes thick, and a bit hot. This was at its best immediately after opening, and turned dull and flat after a few minutes in the glass.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Food and Wine with Craig and Nita -- Wow: Served blind. Popped and poured. The color is a very pale red. The nose delivers brooding aromas of dark fruit, smoke, spice and mineral that to me screamed Burgundy. In the mouth this is more puzzling. There is plenty of ripe fruit and yet it feels somehow lean. The taste is good but not great. Probably showing just a touch too much acidity. Finishes very tannic but with nice length on the finish. I ended up reaching with a guess of '04 Burgundy. The nose really appealed to me and I'm pretty sure I scored this higher than others at the tasting.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
light garnet color with slight watery edge. very subdued nose, even after 3 days and decanting. This was stored at proper temp/humidity since release. Needless to say I was expecting something pretty nice, but instead got a relatively lifeless wine. Virtually no nose of any kind on the first and second day. By the third day, there was an acute herbal nature that dominated any fruit that may have been present. Also, there was the slightest TCA element that seemed to float in and out. 14.6% alcohol was always in the background. To its credit, the wine did have an elegant texture. It proved so-so when paired with our salmon salad course. Roughly $70
Drink now
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Hanzell Vertical (Union Restaurant, Seattle.): Nice. Slight Peychaud bitters, slight lichen as well. Soft fruits. Good suaveness, though a back feeling of corkiness makes occassional appearance.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
A couple Cali-Pinots with Roy Hersh and others (Redmond, WA): Gorgeous lusterous color. At first, a very shy nose, which came around after about 45 minutes to reveal some apple skins and licorice. A silky wine. Very pure and fruit-driven. Great red fruit intensity and persistence. As the wine warms up, a note of tobacco emerges. Sadly, the wine was just hitting its stride when we finished the last of it. A "hold" wine.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Started out very subdued and simple. Not much to say at that point. About 45 mins after opening, really began developing nice Burgundy like dirtyness, longer, richer finish, acids more deliniated (sp?) and overall better wien 92 pts at that point. But it only lasted there about 20-30 mins then QUICKLY downhill. back to boring and simple. Really odd to happen SO quickly...
Note, cork was pretty soaked up high, and I bought this bottle from someone who bought this bottle, so provenance unknown. This is a possible cause of the quick decline (and I would lean to believe it so...)
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
11/19/2016 - achasd Likes this wine: 91 Points
Surprisingly good -- better than my last bottle. Too bad it was the last one.
The wine looks garnet colored. There is no sediment in the bottle. It smells like red currant.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
9/16/2016 - nzinkgraf wrote:
Earth and goat-y notes to the nose. A very stone-y expression on the nose. A little band-aid aroma and that follows very quietly to the palate. Very mineral and a little grassy/sous-bois, but still very fresh and even less evolved than the 1999 Chardonnay. Very much a Burg express, as opposed to CA. Again, still 3+ years ahead of fine drankin'.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
9/8/2016 - achasd Likes this wine: 90 Points
Better than expected. Past prime but good for another year or so
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
12/6/2014 - rocknroller wrote: 90 Points
Annual Tasting Group Holiday Party (La Belle Vie, Mpls): Medium dark red color. Small pour. Mint, red fruits, medium plus body, firm tannins, a bit syrupy, spiced.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
12/6/2014 - chablis28 wrote: 91 Points
This was an interesting pour alongside a 91 Echez. Normally I wouldn't think of Hanzell as a big wine but this definitely showed more richness and meat on the bone than the side by side '91 Burg. Very enjoyable. I detect a bit a bit of brown sugar creeping in which makes me think this should be drank up within next year or so. That said, I only recently acquired this and can't attest to its provenance. The btl and cork were pristine though.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
7/25/2014 - chablis28 wrote: 90 Points
PNP... I'm largely in agreement with twoamps notes of exactly a month ago. I would say though that I enjoyed this more, closer to release. We had tasted this wine at the winery with Bob's assistant winemaker and it was very pretty way back then. That said, today its still very interesting with its tertiary flavors but perhaps on the downward slope. I have one more left and I plan to drink that one very soon too. In fairness though this was a more recent acquisition and I can't vouch for its past storage. The cork was pretty soaked up.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
10/22/2009 - twoamps wrote: 91 Points
nicely aged. Earthy and leatherly, but just enough. Still great pinot fruit, just a bit more mellow than new. Oddly, liked much better than earlier bottles.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
5/8/2009 - Siggy wrote: 80 Points
Chef Nita's Tasting Menu (Craig's House): Tasted blind; I pegged this as a California Pinot and guessed Rhys or Littorai. Nose of woodsmoke/campfire that leads to sweet, heady flavors of dark fruit, baking spice, forest floor, and oak. Finishes thick, and a bit hot. This was at its best immediately after opening, and turned dull and flat after a few minutes in the glass.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
5/8/2009 - Dave Dalluge wrote: 91 Points
Food and Wine with Craig and Nita -- Wow: Served blind. Popped and poured. The color is a very pale red. The nose delivers brooding aromas of dark fruit, smoke, spice and mineral that to me screamed Burgundy. In the mouth this is more puzzling. There is plenty of ripe fruit and yet it feels somehow lean. The taste is good but not great. Probably showing just a touch too much acidity. Finishes very tannic but with nice length on the finish. I ended up reaching with a guess of '04 Burgundy. The nose really appealed to me and I'm pretty sure I scored this higher than others at the tasting.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
8/17/2008 - Tim Heaton wrote:
light garnet color with slight watery edge. very subdued nose, even after 3 days and decanting. This was stored at proper temp/humidity since release. Needless to say I was expecting something pretty nice, but instead got a relatively lifeless wine. Virtually no nose of any kind on the first and second day. By the third day, there was an acute herbal nature that dominated any fruit that may have been present. Also, there was the slightest TCA element that seemed to float in and out. 14.6% alcohol was always in the background. To its credit, the wine did have an elegant texture. It proved so-so when paired with our salmon salad course. Roughly $70
Drink now
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
4/15/2007 - AndrewSGHall wrote:
Hanzell Vertical (Union Restaurant, Seattle.): Nice. Slight Peychaud bitters, slight lichen as well. Soft fruits. Good suaveness, though a back feeling of corkiness makes occassional appearance.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
4/15/2007 - Eric wrote:
Hanzell Vertical (Seattle, WA): Very much in the vein of the 1998. Some say this was corked but not mine! Big, lush and gorgeous.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
11/11/2006 - futronic wrote: 86 Points
Dinner w/ The Highdesertwines, Pinot/Pinto Envy et al (Chateau Chang, Victorville, CA): Light-medium ruby colour. Aromas of cinnamon, red fruit, and alcohol. Light-medium bodied, with red fruit following through to the short, 15-20s finish.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
2/15/2005 - Blair Curtis wrote: 91 Points
A couple Cali-Pinots with Roy Hersh and others (Redmond, WA): Gorgeous lusterous color. At first, a very shy nose, which came around after about 45 minutes to reveal some apple skins and licorice. A silky wine. Very pure and fruit-driven. Great red fruit intensity and persistence. As the wine warms up, a note of tobacco emerges. Sadly, the wine was just hitting its stride when we finished the last of it. A "hold" wine.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
1/16/2005 - Mattswines wrote: 88 Points
Started out very subdued and simple. Not much to say at that point. About 45 mins after opening, really began developing nice Burgundy like dirtyness, longer, richer finish, acids more deliniated (sp?) and overall better wien 92 pts at that point. But it only lasted there about 20-30 mins then QUICKLY downhill. back to boring and simple. Really odd to happen SO quickly...
Note, cork was pretty soaked up high, and I bought this bottle from someone who bought this bottle, so provenance unknown. This is a possible cause of the quick decline (and I would lean to believe it so...)
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment