At best this was okay. Rich golden color, pleasant enough nose, but oddly effervescent out of the bottle; while the bubbles did diminish over the course of an hour, they never left entirely, and imparted a sharp note that was not appropriate to the wine. Sufficient flavor, but no dominant theme; not much oakiness (although some in the background), some buttery notes, but then . . . nothing. If I'm not to succomb to grade inflation here, and I take the 100-point rating scale seriously, then this is no better than a 79. I won't be looking for any more bottles, at least not in this vintage (which seems to have worn out its welcome).
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
11/9/2006 - Johannes.knops@xjtlu.edu.cn wrote: 75 Points
I concur. My last bottle and strangely full of bubbles. Lost most of its fruit and not much left.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
5/6/2005 - Quequeg wrote: 79 Points
At best this was okay. Rich golden color, pleasant enough nose, but oddly effervescent out of the bottle; while the bubbles did diminish over the course of an hour, they never left entirely, and imparted a sharp note that was not appropriate to the wine. Sufficient flavor, but no dominant theme; not much oakiness (although some in the background), some buttery notes, but then . . . nothing. If I'm not to succomb to grade inflation here, and I take the 100-point rating scale seriously, then this is no better than a 79. I won't be looking for any more bottles, at least not in this vintage (which seems to have worn out its welcome).
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment