I bought two bottles of this when it first came out and drank the first bottle about 5 or 6 years ago. It was terrible - hot and disjointed with little fruit.
Tonight, it's a different animal entirely. Deep, balanced and complex. Drinks very young. I wish I had a few more of these to see how it evolves.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
10/28/2023 - Joelene wrote: 90 Points
Stewed fruits, prune. Some savoriness, mature. Drinking well.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
4/1/2021 - meniscus Likes this wine: 89 Points
I bought two bottles of this when it first came out and drank the first bottle about 5 or 6 years ago. It was terrible - hot and disjointed with little fruit.
Tonight, it's a different animal entirely. Deep, balanced and complex. Drinks very young. I wish I had a few more of these to see how it evolves.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
12/28/2020 - LopedeAguirre wrote: flawed
Strange, sweet and sour. Like Chinese food.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
12/7/2018 - A2BigRed Likes this wine: 88 Points
Well balanced and sophisticated spiciness with medium body, though weaker finish may indicate a bit past its prime.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
4/26/2018 - europat55 wrote: 89 Points
2003 Chateauenuf du Papes (Tom's house in Palo Alto, California): Nose: B+/B++ Palate: B+/B++
My #7, Group's #8 (112 pts) Tasted blind.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment