From Magnum. Initially closed, opened up more and more with air but stayed brooding and a touch rustic for a Rich. I prefer the 2004 and 2010 to this as they display more elegance and fragrance. May be this wine needs more time despite being almost 20. 94-96 range
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
9/11/2022 - Collector1855 wrote: 95 Points
200 Burgundy Grand Crus from vintage 2000, 4-day blind tasting (Singapore): Aromatic, underbrush, cool forest, pine, wood stack with moss, earthy, serious, somber, lacking more fruit for a higher score.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
1/17/2020 - fcxj wrote: 86 Points
Forgettable and rustic. Multiple tries.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
1/10/2019 - fcxj wrote: 88 Points
Bit muddy, bit cooked. Prunes.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
12/8/2018 - Collector1855 wrote: 94 Points
From Magnum. Initially closed, opened up more and more with air but stayed brooding and a touch rustic for a Rich. I prefer the 2004 and 2010 to this as they display more elegance and fragrance. May be this wine needs more time despite being almost 20. 94-96 range
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
11/17/2018 - hprphf wrote: 93 Points
Acker 2018/11 (Marea): Raspberry, dark florals, fresh acidity with rounded stem. Great straight palate and really open later. 93+
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment