12x Bordeaux 1983 vs 1993: All wines tasted single blind. Not decanted. As anticipated, the 1983 vintage prevailed in our comparative tasting, scoring 8 to 2 wins against the 1993 vintage, with two ties. The structured, classic ’83s exhibited greater depth and harmony compared to the ‘93s, which tended to be simpler, sometimes slightly green and dry, or at their best, fresh and light. However, in both vintages, aside from a few notable labels, many wines were evidently beyond their peak. The standout was, unsurprisingly, the Margaux (94pts). Tasting the some of the same ’83s a second time a few days later with decanting showed a marked improvement, highlighting the need of aeration.
TN: Initially, the nose is not overly expressive, offering just a bit of dark fruit and minerality. However, with time it opens up significantly, revealing fine blue fruit, cola, and minty notes, becoming superb. On the palate, it's fresh in the midsection with red berries, stems, and earthy tones, but slightly drying towards the finish. Overall, it's decent. The nose alone merits a 94, but considering the entire experience, it probably lands at 91pts overall (vs 88pts of the 1993).
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Bordeaux 1983 vs 1993 face-off: Green grassy notes of asparagus, red cherry fruit, fine oak notes, a bit of leather. Quite enjoyable so far. The palate with decent structure, but rather high on acidity and mouthcoating tannin, felt like several more years needed to fully integrate – but not sure if the aromas will live to witness this.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Hard to rate, but still enjoyable drinking. My bottle had the cork almost soaked through, but I don't think air had entered. Tannins have fully resolved, still had enough of an acidic backbone. Aromas were much nicer after 1 hour double-decanted.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Still some blackberry and strawberry fruit with earthy undertones. Opens a bit tight. but with time the tannins fill in on the pallet and the wine is quite enjoyable. Reccomend decant for 30-60 mins prior to serving.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
12/28/2023 - Cailles wrote: 91 Points
12x Bordeaux 1983 vs 1993: All wines tasted single blind. Not decanted. As anticipated, the 1983 vintage prevailed in our comparative tasting, scoring 8 to 2 wins against the 1993 vintage, with two ties. The structured, classic ’83s exhibited greater depth and harmony compared to the ‘93s, which tended to be simpler, sometimes slightly green and dry, or at their best, fresh and light. However, in both vintages, aside from a few notable labels, many wines were evidently beyond their peak. The standout was, unsurprisingly, the Margaux (94pts). Tasting the some of the same ’83s a second time a few days later with decanting showed a marked improvement, highlighting the need of aeration.
TN: Initially, the nose is not overly expressive, offering just a bit of dark fruit and minerality. However, with time it opens up significantly, revealing fine blue fruit, cola, and minty notes, becoming superb. On the palate, it's fresh in the midsection with red berries, stems, and earthy tones, but slightly drying towards the finish. Overall, it's decent. The nose alone merits a 94, but considering the entire experience, it probably lands at 91pts overall (vs 88pts of the 1993).
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
11/20/2023 - sirpat00 wrote: 90 Points
Bordeaux 1983 vs 1993 face-off: Green grassy notes of asparagus, red cherry fruit, fine oak notes, a bit of leather. Quite enjoyable so far. The palate with decent structure, but rather high on acidity and mouthcoating tannin, felt like several more years needed to fully integrate – but not sure if the aromas will live to witness this.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
10/21/2023 - wylee Likes this wine: 90 Points
Hard to rate, but still enjoyable drinking. My bottle had the cork almost soaked through, but I don't think air had entered. Tannins have fully resolved, still had enough of an acidic backbone. Aromas were much nicer after 1 hour double-decanted.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
7/17/2022 - Malarky997 Likes this wine: 94 Points
Holding up well
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
9/12/2021 - VAVintner Likes this wine: 91 Points
Still some blackberry and strawberry fruit with earthy undertones. Opens a bit tight. but with time the tannins fill in on the pallet and the wine is quite enjoyable. Reccomend decant for 30-60 mins prior to serving.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment