Advertisement

Who Likes This Wine(8)

  1. jmprusko

    jmprusko

    385 Tasting Notes

  2. PinkMoonWinery

    PinkMoonWinery

    4,183 Tasting Notes

  3. Brmaso

    Brmaso

    16 Tasting Notes

More

Food Pairing Tags

Add My Food Pairing Tags

Community Tasting Notes (67) Avg Score: 91.1 points

  • the merlot really came through.....very approachable indeed. wish i had a few more bottles

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Part of a blind tasting, this had fairly obvious notes typical for the year with extracted blackberry, chocolate, and a very round and soft finish consistent with the high level of Merlot in the blend. Interestingly, this has opened up nicely compared to last year and other tastings of left bank 2003's have also performed well.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Coravin 12/8/14: Medium ruby color, very little bricking appropriate for age; nose has red fruit, slight sweet spice, slight mint and herbal, youthful and a bit wound up; palate is full bodied, tannins significant but approachable throughout palate, initial red cherry fruit, tight, good depth on the palate, tart cranberry through midpalate and into finish; medium length finish with some fruit. Overall an excellent classically-styled St. Emilion, not showing the heat of 2003 on the nose (maybe slightly on palate) but showing very young and tight, if approachable, maybe a bit one-dimensional through the midpalate, though that may be its youth. Next bottle in 5+ years minimum. 90-91+
    30 min update: With some air, this does start to show the ripe fruits on the palate I expected from a hot vintage. Enjoyable, but it may hold it back from being great, as I tend to prefer the complexity of cooler climate wines.
    12/27: Still quite a dense ruby color without bricking; nose is very intriguing with good complexity of mint, herbal, floral, slight nice green and bell pepper; palate is full bodied, slight spice, red and black fruits, here showing a bit of heat, nice dose of green on the palate as well that is balanced, still strong tannins. As above, very nice wine (maybe a bit better than when I first tried it) that needs a lot of time, but promising that it will improve, though likely never superb. 92+

    1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

  • Declined. Not much left. No fruitiness.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Color is dark garnet with lightening at the rim. Nose was initially a bit reserved but eventually showed dark fruits, tar, smoke, and roasted coffee. On the palate, the wine has dark fruit up front but this is fairly quickly met with charred wood flavors which have not fully integrated. Tannins and acidity are also present and slightly out of balance. There is still fruit there, but I'm wondering whether this wine will ever really come together.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

View all 67 Community Tasting Notes

What Do You Think? Add a Tasting Note

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.

JancisRobinson.com

Vinous

JancisRobinson.com

Vinous

JancisRobinson.com

Vinous

Winedoctor

  • By Chris Kissack
    October 2005, (See more on Winedoctor...) 16.5+ points

    (Chateau Troplong-Mondot St Emilion) A nice, lifted, elegant black fruit nose. Similar elegance on the palate, which has a nicely rounded texture, and it has sufficient substance to cover the firm, grippy tannins that lie beneath. Lovely although quite masculine style. Very good.

NOTE: Some content is property of JancisRobinson.com and Vinous and Winedoctor.

Add a Pro Review Add Your Own Reviews:
 

Report a problem with the information on this page.

$Where to Buy
powered by wine-searcher.com
×