Rich and broad, but not nearly as giving as the bottle of 2012 LGA I had last week. Surprisingly restrained. Maybe it needs more time? Will try again tomorrow but not sure if it's worth the premium for me.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Kräftiges Goldgeb. Die Nase ist sehr Bollinger-typisch, deutet die Opulenz schon an, offenherzig, dezent rauchig, Hefeteig, nussige Noten, reife Frucht, steinig unterlegt. Im Gaumen mit cremiger Textur und viel Druck, was für ein Schaumwein, barock, verschnörkelt, verspielt, top Perlage, sehr gute Struktur, grandiosoe Länge.
3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
blind This time a bit "disappointing". The finish is a bit blurred. Some herbal notes and you feel the "heavieness" of the PN. I guessed right. The first bottle reminded me to a CdM. This is far away from that gem. 94
3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Flickinger Tasting at The Casino (Chicago, IL): Must admit I didn't really like (or maybe understand) this. There are sherried, oxidative notes here, but the wine is very fresh and acid-driven on the palate. Overall, this is neither here nor there and isn't the sort of Champagne I'm personally looking for.
4 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
3/16/2024 - Ghoulardi wrote:
Rich and broad, but not nearly as giving as the bottle of 2012 LGA I had last week. Surprisingly restrained. Maybe it needs more time? Will try again tomorrow but not sure if it's worth the premium for me.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
3/1/2024 - vvWine.ch wrote: 96 Points
Kräftiges Goldgeb. Die Nase ist sehr Bollinger-typisch, deutet die Opulenz schon an, offenherzig, dezent rauchig, Hefeteig, nussige Noten, reife Frucht, steinig unterlegt. Im Gaumen mit cremiger Textur und viel Druck, was für ein Schaumwein, barock, verschnörkelt, verspielt, top Perlage, sehr gute Struktur, grandiosoe Länge.
3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
2/29/2024 - aquacongas Likes this wine: 94 Points
blind
This time a bit "disappointing". The finish is a bit blurred. Some herbal notes and you feel the "heavieness" of the PN. I guessed right. The first bottle reminded me to a CdM. This is far away from that gem. 94
3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
1/17/2024 - acyso wrote: 90 Points
Flickinger Tasting at The Casino (Chicago, IL): Must admit I didn't really like (or maybe understand) this. There are sherried, oxidative notes here, but the wine is very fresh and acid-driven on the palate. Overall, this is neither here nor there and isn't the sort of Champagne I'm personally looking for.
4 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
1/3/2024 - The Vines That Bind wrote: 94 Points
Good brioche here, warm, round, crisp, good example of the vintage. This was Dom-like, maybe with a tiny bit more red fruit. Very powerful.
2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment