Straddling the fence between hedonistic and intellectual, the truffle, rose, violet, tobacco and dark plum nose gets you, holds you and makes you take another sniff before you sip. Full bodied, concentrated, silky, smooth and still young, there is still tannin to soften. But there is so much ripe fruit you can drink it today. But if you have patience, give it 5 to 10 more years and you’re going to be taste pure magic.
Tasted next to the 2006. The fruit on the nose seemed a bit darker, riper, with great depth again. On the palate much more backward and firm with a nice, long mineral finish. This needs a bit more time but is very promising. 94-95+
This one needs some time to come around still very young. Tasted along side the 2004 and 2008. This one had noticeably more tannins from the french oak than the other two. At first blush, the 2004 was drinking great. Over a two hour period of sipping all three the 2005 came out to shine. I still think this needs way more time to develop, but should be a special wine if given enough cellar time.
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
(Vieux Chateau Certan) I didn’t find any flaws in the 2005 Vieux Chateau Certan, I must confess. It was perfumed, subtle and shy at first, with light purple fruit, nut and earth aromas. Bottled in May of 2007 and about two-thirds Merlot, the ’05 was rich and concentrated, but Alexander found the ’04 ‘thicker and more complex,’ and I saw that in the nose of the 2004 over time, but not the palate. The ’05 was chewy and fleshy, and its dryness did, indeed, stand out, per Alexander’s previous comment. I liked its grip, however, and its acidity really stood out, along with its delicious ceramic and mineral flavors
NOTE: Some content is property of JancisRobinson.com and Vinous and Vintage Tastings.