2016 Vieux Château Certan

Community Tasting Notes (24) Avg Score: 97 points

• Options

  • Post a Comment
  • View Lord of the Bottles's profile
  • Report Issue

  10/8/2023 - Lord of the Bottles Likes this wine:

  This was more closed than last year’s bottle and seems to be shutting down, though a 2-3 hour decan did evoke some smoky mulberry fruit and sensual cherry on the finish. This will be a stupendous wine when it re opens but for now drink your ‘15s. Score withheld but showed flashes of 97 points.

  2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

• Options

  • Post a Comment
  • View Eriklainen's profile
  • Report Issue

  7/31/2023 - Eriklainen wrote:

  Long. Velvety. It is a gem

  2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comments (3)

• Options

  • Post a Comment
  • View RAB007's profile
  • Report Issue

  7/21/2023 - RAB007 wrote: 100 Points

  Nothing to add to the 5 triple digit scores from professionals. Almost Napa-like full throttle fruit, but with much more complexity. An exquisite expression of grape juice

  4 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comments (3)

• Options

  • Post a Comment
  • View Cailles's profile
  • Report Issue

  6/8/2023 - Cailles wrote: 95 Points

  Vieux Chateau Certan 2014-2017 tasted side -by-side. No detailed notes taken. Winner was the 2016 as it had the most finesse and a precision and purity unmatched by the other vintages. The other vintages were a bit less exciting today (all 92/93pts) but all have potential for more. Once thing that was striking: at least this young, I couldn‘t find the big common denominator. Blind, I wouldn‘t have guessed these wines to be all from the same Chateau.
  
  2014 - 93pts: I like this wine quite a lot and rated it 95pts before. But this bottle was a bit more muted (it was a root day). Constantly evolving this was all about minerality and soil notes with a fresh, a bit timid fruit component. With time some coffee notes got this to a higher level. Quite elegant but without the depth (15/16) or precision (16) of great vintages.
  
  2015 - 93pts: This was the most sensual, smooth, satiny wine with loads of ripe fruit and a bit too much spices for my taste. While this can become a great vintage, it is a bit too much today for my taste. A bit too Napa-esque. The alcohol is quite well covered. My guess is that once this sheds its baby fat and better integrates, this could become a great wine in the 95+ point category.
  
  2016 - 95pts: This wine perfectly reflected the elegance, depth and hyper purity of the vintage. That extra kick of freshness and all the cooler blue fruit notes got me. This could become a masterpiece and has a lot of upside. It was a joy to drink today and hence the 95pts but once mature, this should reach the 97+ pts category.
  
  2017 - 92 pts: In the best moments this showed great promise with fine pure red fruit, coffee and minerality. But throughout the evening this never fully opened up but especially never fully integrated well. I‘ve had some other 2017s which are drinking exceptionally well today. This bottle didn‘t. 91/92pts today but I see higher potential for this.
  
  Decanting: All wines needed time to open up and improved markedly with air. I would at least go for two hours in the decanter for all of them.

  6 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comments (1)

• Options

  • Post a Comment
  • View Lord of the Bottles's profile
  • Report Issue

  7/19/2022 - Lord of the Bottles Likes this wine: 95 Points

  Decanted for an hour but was most open at the 2 hour mark. Paired with grilled picanha for Sunday dinner in our garden. This was somewhat closed with flashes of black and red fruit and dark chocolate. Blueberries. Some coffee. At times it had an insanely long finish of raspberries and mulberries - Lafleur? Petrus? - but overall 95 now with 97-98 potential in many years. Don’t open your bottles and drink the 2015 in the meantime.

  3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comments (3)

View all 24 Community Tasting Notes

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.