Advertisement

Who Likes This Wine(9)

  1. axz055

    axz055

    347 Tasting Notes

  2. BillBell73

    BillBell73

    1,455 Tasting Notes

  3. PacoHigon

    PacoHigon

    3,578 Tasting Notes

More

Food Pairing Tags

Add My Food Pairing Tags

Community Tasting Notes (37) Avg Score: 92 points

  • A very good bottle of this wine, and while it’s not as breathtaking as the Vina Real of 1966 can be, this still has a lot to offer. Mushroom, aged soy sauce, iron, and dried cherry on the palate and a haunting, beautiful, umami-laden nose. Still retains some ruby red at the core with a fair bit of bricking. No way I would guess this as a fifty-plus year old wine.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Madeirized

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • 11x Mature Rioja (1928-1999): Three CVNEs from the 1960s tasted side by side. I’ve had amazing experiences with 60s wines from this winery before including a perfect 100 pts experience with a magical bottle of the 1964 Vina Real Gran Reserva a year ago. Hence, expectations for this series were quite high and that’s why the disappointment was immense with two out of three bottles showing faulty or dead. The 1962 Vina Real Gran Reserva (NR) was completely dead, well past its prime (probably a faulty cork as provenance was impeccable). The 1966 Imperial Gran Reserva (NR) was unfortunately corked. Fortunately, the 1966 Vina Real Gran Reserva (rated 94 pts) was singing and one of the wines of the night thanks to a lot of substance, sexiness, precision and tension. Like my 100 pts experience with the Vina Real from the same vintage, this needed time and got better by the minute. Despite to flawed bottles, I still think these old CVNEs are worth any search.

    TN: Corked.

    1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

  • Old Rioja tasting: Old Rioja tasting, privately organized. Even though 3 out of 11 bottles were flawed, the tasting was once more testament to the outstanding ageability of Rioja. While clearly not a representative sample, the Tondonias were all intact while 2 out of 3 CVNEs were flawed. That said, where the one that was still intact (1964) easily beat the Tondonia. The WOTN was neither, however, but a Paternina from 1928 (95).

    Tasting note:
    Corked unfortunately, would have loved to compare to the 1964 head to head…

    1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

  • Acker Auction BYO (Craft NYC): Minty, herb, clay and earthy, mature red cherry aromas. A bit austere on the palate with fruit receding.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

View all 37 Community Tasting Notes

What Do You Think? Add a Tasting Note

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.

View From the Cellar

NOTE: Some content is property of View From the Cellar.

Add a Pro Review Add Your Own Reviews:
 

Advertisement

×