This wine was slightly off. There was earth and forest floor flavors with hints of plum and tobacco but something was a little flawed. Drank with a 1945 Beychevelle and 1949 Haut Brion which were both better.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
72 years old and really showing its age. The nose was impressive (sweet barnyard) but the flavors were difficult to identify because they were so muted. Some fruit remains but its mostly dried out and weak. Ullage was mid-shoulder. This wine is now a footnote in history.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Drunk at Epure in Hong Kong - The run that Latour produced from '45 to '49 has to go down in history as one of the most phenomenal sequences of successful wine making in the history of mankind. Tasting all five of them together was quite a privilege. The '47 has a notes of forest floor on the nose. Good acid, not volatile as some have experienced. Along with the '48 probably not the strongest of the 5 and surpassed by '47 Mouton tasted the day before.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Not a great vintage for Latour. And supposedly many ‘47s have excess volatile acidity in this very hot year. Astringent finish. Not in a class with the ‘45 or ‘49. But still has decent grip and a vestige of fruit.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
(Château Latour Grand Vin) medium brick red with pale meniscus; plum and plum preserves nose; port-like, ripe, rich plum, black fruit and cherry palate, reminiscent of ’47 Petrus; long finish 93+ pts.
NOTE: Some content is property of Vinous and Vintage Tastings and JancisRobinson.com and RJonWine.com.
8/10/2020 - Boone's Farm Likes this wine: 89 Points
This wine was slightly off. There was earth and forest floor flavors with hints of plum and tobacco but something was a little flawed. Drank with a 1945 Beychevelle and 1949 Haut Brion which were both better.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
6/1/2020 - fcxj wrote: 92 Points
Lipstick, lightly floral, quite lovely aromatics.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
9/18/2019 - Sanlucar wrote: 88 Points
72 years old and really showing its age. The nose was impressive (sweet barnyard) but the flavors were difficult to identify because they were so muted. Some fruit remains but its mostly dried out and weak. Ullage was mid-shoulder. This wine is now a footnote in history.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
3/1/2019 - KoalaHK wrote:
Drunk at Epure in Hong Kong - The run that Latour produced from '45 to '49 has to go down in history as one of the most phenomenal sequences of successful wine making in the history of mankind. Tasting all five of them together was quite a privilege. The '47 has a notes of forest floor on the nose. Good acid, not volatile as some have experienced. Along with the '48 probably not the strongest of the 5 and surpassed by '47 Mouton tasted the day before.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
7/12/2018 - sdr Does not like this wine: 85 Points
Not a great vintage for Latour. And supposedly many ‘47s have excess volatile acidity in this very hot year. Astringent finish. Not in a class with the ‘45 or ‘49. But still has decent grip and a vestige of fruit.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment