Advertisement

Who Likes This Wine(5)

  1. BenBullock

    BenBullock

    10 Tasting Notes

  2. Burgnick

    Burgnick

    6,520 Tasting Notes

  3. JJYoyo

    JJYoyo

    1,095 Tasting Notes

More

Food Pairing Tags

Add My Food Pairing Tags

Community Tasting Notes (41) Avg Score: 92.2 points

  • A sound bottle and solid example of 1995, but alongside a singing ‘71 DRC Grands Echezeaux so comparatively a little quiet. Lots of dark fruit, nothing muddled or unduly stewed but a darker, tighter, leaner wine. Adds great spice, stems, and florals the longer it’s in the glass. I think this could easily be decanted. Maybe a little singular or wanting in complexity or flashiness, but again, tough comparison. Would like to revisit this in isolation. 94-

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • A funny, surly nose but expanding so nicely on the palate - detailed blue and black berries, a little exotic spice, an appealing mineral component. Fine, broad, soft and with excellent depth. I quite liked this, though a little green emerged with time and that was less welcome.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • This was really good and vying for wine of the day honours. There was a wealth of red fruits here both on the nose and in the mouth. There were gorgeous florals. It was rich and a strap of licorice weaved through the flavour profile. The finish was expansive and had precision and tang.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • From magnum. Good showing for vintage often lacking charm with rough edges on palate softened. Dried floral aromatics, albeit not exuberantly so.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Almost exactly 1 year after my last tasting. This time, a 3 hr decant. The extra air time let this wine integrate into the harmonious whole that appeared only toward the end of the last bottle. This is nowhere near falling apart. Safely 2 decades ahead of it. Right now it takes a little coaxing and expertise to get both the massive primary notes of black cherry aligned with the very beginnings of tertiary - a little rare roast beef, some umami, a little tobacco. In between there is gorgeous singed stalkiness, pain d’epices, violet, you name it. It’s not terroir any more: it comes across as the Platonic ideal of Burgundy. No one element dominates, and the genius of the house style is to make it seem like they did... nothing at all. Less pyrotechnic than the last time, more integrated and definitive this time. What Burg was always meant to be. Wow.
    Score: 96. Relative to expectations: ++ because at these prices, I am going to be unreasonably picky.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

View all 41 Community Tasting Notes

What Do You Think? Add a Tasting Note

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.

JancisRobinson.com

View From the Cellar

Burghound

Vintage Tastings

Burghound

Vinous

  • By Stephen Tanzer
    March/April 1998, IWC Issue #77, (See more on Vinous...)

    (Domaine de la Romanee Conti Romanee St. Vivant) Login and sign up and see review text.

Burghound

RJonWine.com

  • By Richard Jennings
    7/16/2008, (See more on RJonWine.com...) 95 points

    (Domaine de la Romanée-Conti Romanée St. Vivant) Medium cherry color with sediment and pale meniscus; gorgeous raspberry and tart cherry nose; tasty, tart cherry, raspberry, spice palate with depth and good acidity; long finish

NOTE: Some content is property of JancisRobinson.com and View From the Cellar and Burghound and Vintage Tastings and Vinous and RJonWine.com.

Add a Pro Review Add Your Own Reviews:
 

Advertisement

×