Popped and poured. Presented double-blind; no formal notes. There’s a nice mix of red and dark fruits. Some light staining to the glass. The attack was slightly sweet and there’s quite a bit of structure. I was definitely in Italy…but was it Nebbiolo or Sangiovese? I felt the acid sort of took precedence over the tannin. Between that and the slight bit of vanilla and baking spice, this had me leaning Sangiovese-based blend from Toscano; from a modern producer. So I called that: IGT Super Tuscan from 2013. Welp…it was Pio Cesare's Barolo “Ornato”, 2010. One of those reminders to me: if you don’t drink this style of Barolo, it’s hard to call it blind. Anyway, I thought this was a nice wine but didn’t give me the feels that I want and frankly, with such great land like the Ornato MGA in a classic vintage like 2010, I just want more from this. Perhaps I’m being too critical. Perhaps this needs more time? Drink now with patience or drink through 2035…it could probably go longer.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Sublime. Sweet cherry, macerated cherry, cranberry and tobacco on the nose and palate. Multilayered with nuance and depth on the palate. Oak not entirely integrated at this point, but tannins and general acidity keep any flabbiness in check. Drinking well now, but years to go still. Buy more.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
3/24/2023 - thesternowl wrote: 91 Points
Popped and poured. Presented double-blind; no formal notes. There’s a nice mix of red and dark fruits. Some light staining to the glass. The attack was slightly sweet and there’s quite a bit of structure. I was definitely in Italy…but was it Nebbiolo or Sangiovese? I felt the acid sort of took precedence over the tannin. Between that and the slight bit of vanilla and baking spice, this had me leaning Sangiovese-based blend from Toscano; from a modern producer. So I called that: IGT Super Tuscan from 2013. Welp…it was Pio Cesare's Barolo “Ornato”, 2010. One of those reminders to me: if you don’t drink this style of Barolo, it’s hard to call it blind. Anyway, I thought this was a nice wine but didn’t give me the feels that I want and frankly, with such great land like the Ornato MGA in a classic vintage like 2010, I just want more from this. Perhaps I’m being too critical. Perhaps this needs more time? Drink now with patience or drink through 2035…it could probably go longer.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
11/4/2022 - nschmidt Likes this wine: 92 Points
Quite tasty but I'm not sure I see a difference vs the normal. Maybe with more time?
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
2/10/2022 - jan erik wrote: 93 Points
- Crimsom color - Magic!
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
10/23/2021 - vino_per_tutti Likes this wine: 93 Points
Sublime. Sweet cherry, macerated cherry, cranberry and tobacco on the nose and palate. Multilayered with nuance and depth on the palate. Oak not entirely integrated at this point, but tannins and general acidity keep any flabbiness in check. Drinking well now, but years to go still. Buy more.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
10/3/2020 - robferguson1 wrote: 92 Points
Didn’t decanter so it was a touch young but a very good wine , decant 3-4 hours
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment