11/17/23, 3:01 PM - Thanks for the catch. Fixed now
10/8/23, 2:44 AM - It is the best qpr in the Penfold range!
9/29/23, 3:57 AM - I would say at least an hour, probably two. It’s a very good wine. I think it needs more time though.
9/28/23, 7:17 AM - You can drink it now but it will be glorious in ten years
9/3/23, 2:55 AM - No worries. Nothing wrong with this wine. Still can mature for a while.
6/24/23, 7:45 AM - Yes this doesn’t need a lot of air before drinking well. Drank it next to a 2000 la mission which would benefit from much more airtime!
5/27/23, 6:34 AM - I don’t have enough experience across vintages to comment well. I have had a bunch of 2010 and 2012s and both vintages have aged very well. 2014 is exceptional right now.
5/27/23, 6:42 AM - I would also add I find this wine is quite consistently excellent across vintages
5/18/23, 5:49 AM - Well described. Agreed.
2/25/23, 12:39 PM - But it’s so good now…
4/16/22, 11:03 AM - Thank you for that feedback. I will keep that in mind in future tastings.
3/4/22, 6:06 PM - I drank it over only about an hour so didn’t get to see the same spectrum as you did but I would believe it. These are terrific wines. I’ve just got to have the patience to age some of them!
2/12/22, 6:53 PM - Thanks for the feedback. I was puzzled by this bottle as I have had many excellent Auberts from this vintage. But I gave this plenty of time. And it just wasn’t that well integrated and didn’t come together. Bottle variation? It can happen with ten year old Cali chardonnay.
12/21/21, 12:16 PM - They drink well now and actually don’t need a long decant but there is still plenty of time so don’t feel rushed
10/17/21, 5:57 PM - Oldwine, thank you for your comments. That is very helpful guidance. You are probably right. Next time I try one I’ll give it a long decant.
10/18/21, 6:54 AM - Thank you very much again for the advice. Will write a review when I get there. I’ve got a bunch of 1991s, a mag of 1997, some 2001s and 2004s in storage. The 1991s in particular have been amazing.
8/15/21, 7:01 PM - Thank you for that background information.
8/15/21, 6:59 PM - Thanks for all your comments. Yes this wine surprised me. If you taste the 2005 and 2010 they are quite powerful, structured wines. Despite the relatively warm year in 2015 this wine is made in quite a different style and is much more approachable early IMO.
8/8/21, 8:14 PM - A little over an hour then tried it. Generally with very old wines I try not to decant to much until I get a feel for how they are reacting to air so I don’t overdecant. After it tasted off I let it sit around for another couple hours to see what would happen but it just got worse
8/8/21, 10:26 PM - Yes agreed. Pretty sure about this one though. Pretty oxidized and vinegar like.
6/14/21, 10:00 AM - Thanks for that insight and fits with where my instincts were headed after tasting it
5/15/21, 5:30 AM - Thank you for catching that! All fixed now. My second bottle of this and they are terrific
3/11/21, 4:06 PM - Thanks for the advice. Luckily I have several more of the 2002 to enjoy in the future. I recently finished off my 2000s and 2003s of which I preferred the 2000s. I haven’t touched my 2004s yet but you are right I probably should start. And I don’t think I have any 2005s
2/10/21, 9:12 AM - Actually I hadn’t focused on the fact this has some barbera in there. That probably does explain it. Do you know what percentage of barbera is included? Anyway I think you’ll enjoy these when you receive yours.
12/30/20, 6:13 AM - Yes sure. Definitely hold longer.
12/20/20, 12:13 AM - I know what you are saying because I have had it before but this bottle was definitely over the hill
12/20/20, 12:30 AM - Me too. I had to keep tasting it because I thought I was missing something but it only got worse as the night went on. I’ve got 3 or 4 more of these And I’m definitely going to drink another soon to see if I’ve got a bad batch
11/7/20, 6:43 AM - So far I haven’t had much luck either
10/31/20, 7:43 PM - Happy to. Unfortunately I have not had good luck with aged Mogadors relative to expectations. They aren’t bad but they aren’t particularly well balanced wines and don’t develop much complexity in my experience. Had a similiar experience with a 2001 several months ago.
10/25/20, 1:02 AM - I have generally good luck with riojas from the 70s and interestingly sometimes the Riservas can be as good or better than the Gran Riservas
7/21/20, 7:00 PM - I was underwhelmed a bit too when I first started drinking it after a two hour decant but 45-60 minutes later it really evolved into some much better which is the basis of my note.
5/1/20, 3:42 PM - Unfortunately I did not! I usually would but I was preoccupied with some other things so I just decanted it. That’s interesting. I guess with 1999 Bordeaux they can be quite forward wines?
4/5/20, 1:40 AM - Thank you for the comment. I increasingly realize many people taste wines too young and write them off as out of balance or over oaked. Sometimes that is true but many wines are designed to age a long time and they become better integrated and balance with time. This wine seems to be a good examples of this. When I tried it two or three years ago it was a bit awkward and I didn’t love it. But now I feel quite confident this is going to get better and better.
2/20/20, 2:59 PM - I wondered that too but it was stored pretty well and bought direct from the winery on release.
12/25/19, 12:21 PM - Unfortunately I haven’t opened my 2008 Kayli Morgan yet so I don’t have any reference point.Kayli is the more classic of the two as he has been making it a long time. But I’ve have had really good experiences with Few and Far Between recently so I think you won’t go wrong either way. Let me know how it goes!
10/2/19, 5:33 AM - I am hard grader. For me 95 points and above needs to be something really special that combines power, complexity, balance and subtlety. This just didn’t have all those elements for me at least on this drinking. Because it’s a big wine with some more decanting or the next day it would have scored a little higher.
9/26/19, 1:13 AM - Yes but I can’t tell with this one. It’s just a guess now so I go by what is in the glass.
9/16/19, 6:52 PM - Thank you!
6/25/19, 8:46 PM - Fair maybe finesse not the right word. Should have used balance instead.
6/5/19, 7:25 PM - Thanks for the advice! I have 5 more of these. Sounds like I should get to work on those sooner.
5/5/19, 10:30 PM - Well I definitely wasn’t expecting or hoping for a fruit bomb. I actually was quite optimistic about the wine- heard good things and have a few more bottles of this and the Howell Mountain. Admittedly, I seem to have a different tasting experience than you and others but that is what I experienced - a fairly awkward wine with a substandard nose. There are a couple possibilities - 1. The bottle had some taint. If I recall this is a bottle I bought at the winery and somehow it has ended up in my cellar in Hong Kong where I live so compared to most of my wines it’s travelled a lot. 2. Maybe I didn’t decant enough? It is a big wine and I have it around an hour but maybe that is not enough. Anyway I’ll wait a year and try another with an open mind. Anyway thanks for your post!
4/28/19, 5:16 AM - It was a cork
4/29/19, 6:17 PM - Yes I was disappointed. I have generally been pleasantly surprised by aged Australian shiraz even some of the high octane names but this one wasn’t working.
10/22/18, 8:57 PM - I could see it being his sort of wine and with his grade inflation are scores may not be all that different on a relative basis!
11/9/14, 3:02 AM - Agreed you have to watch these new world chardonnays carefully. I just had a view Kistlers go over the hill around the same vintage - real bummer.
Thanks for letting us know about this problem. We will review your comments and be in touch soon with an update.
Search