Decanted 1 hour. Clear deep garnet-blood red color. Gorgeous bouquet of fresh red currants, raspberries and their liqueurs; roses, violets, cedar shavings, pipe tobacco, cigar humidor, stony soil. Similar on the palate, medium-full body, satin mouthfeel, seamless, polished, beautifully balanced. Improved with air over several hours. Splendid pairing with Easter dinner of roast leg of lamb.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Last tasted 4 years ago, and the ninth of a case purchased in 2006, i do have to reiterate my rant from then. When they are at the best, and in the right year, first growth wines live up to purchase value and reputation, and although it is uncomfortable on the pocket, it is worth it. Please note I have invested in many great first growths. However, in lesser under performing vintages, I resent having to pay nearly £500 including taxes for a merely good wine because it is an aspirational status brand for non wine aficionados. The VCC at a fraction of the price leaves this in the paddock, whilst the Palmer knocks it and the rest of the first growths out of the park, albeit at a higher price than the VCC. That said, this is a great wine, and one of the better performers in an average year. It possesses an excellent nose, and shows great initial promise but underwhems on the palate and finish. The latter is particularly challenging.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Not decanted. Nose was perplexing, beautiful. Lovely flavours but this bottle lacked oomph, slightly tired - bottle variation as other two recently were bangers. Drank over an hour or so, maybe needed more air.
Drank this in a blind drinking party, it was the second to last one after 99 Latour, 98 Haut Brion, 99 Mouton, 99 Lafite and before 98 La Mission Haut Brion. Stable and balanced as a Margaux should be. Slightly light on nose and taste when compared with the 99 Latour and 98 Haut Brion.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
(Chateau Margaux) #1; COLOR-darker, richer; NOSE-very BIG, aromatic, cherry, red cassis, heavy leather, Asian spice, curry underlying, Earthy, mint; TASTE-this is a MONSTER, very SILKY on mid-palate, luscious, black currant, cherry, hint of strawberry, chocolate & mocha, caramel, hints of butterscotch on finish, all integrated perfectly w/vegetal, PICTURE PERFECT food wine, very POLISHED, PERFECT Old World wine, will go for 15-20 more years, but it's time to pop, it's ROCKING it's face off; RP-94, WS-92; GV-96
(Chateau Margaux) Very floral nose with a nice underlying minerality and some toasty, charred oak. Also some black cherry, cassis, grilled nuts blueberry and wet earth. Great concentration on the palate with a silky texture and wonderfully complex hints of nuts and anise in the midpalate. This very good on day one but really developed compelling complexity on day 2. Flamboyant yet cerebral at the same time.
NOTE: Some content is property of Vinous and WineAlign and JancisRobinson.com and Vintage Tastings and Winedoctor and RJonWine.com and Wine Library TV and Rockss and Fruit.
3/31/2024 - Javachip Likes this wine: 95 Points
Decanted 1 hour. Clear deep garnet-blood red color. Gorgeous bouquet of fresh red currants, raspberries and their liqueurs; roses, violets, cedar shavings, pipe tobacco, cigar humidor, stony soil. Similar on the palate, medium-full body, satin mouthfeel, seamless, polished, beautifully balanced. Improved with air over several hours. Splendid pairing with Easter dinner of roast leg of lamb.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
3/30/2024 - Malarky997 Likes this wine: 92 Points
Is it still too young?
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
3/5/2024 - djhammond Likes this wine: 93 Points
Last tasted 4 years ago, and the ninth of a case purchased in 2006, i do have to reiterate my rant from then. When they are at the best, and in the right year, first growth wines live up to purchase value and reputation, and although it is uncomfortable on the pocket, it is worth it. Please note I have invested in many great first growths. However, in lesser under performing vintages, I resent having to pay nearly £500 including taxes for a merely good wine because it is an aspirational status brand for non wine aficionados. The VCC at a fraction of the price leaves this in the paddock, whilst the Palmer knocks it and the rest of the first growths out of the park, albeit at a higher price than the VCC. That said, this is a great wine, and one of the better performers in an average year. It possesses an excellent nose, and shows great initial promise but underwhems on the palate and finish. The latter is particularly challenging.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
3/2/2024 - jmoon wrote: 94 Points
Not decanted. Nose was perplexing, beautiful. Lovely flavours but this bottle lacked oomph, slightly tired - bottle variation as other two recently were bangers. Drank over an hour or so, maybe needed more air.
3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comments (1)
2/9/2024 - d.f.c Likes this wine: 94 Points
Drank this in a blind drinking party, it was the second to last one after 99 Latour, 98 Haut Brion, 99 Mouton, 99 Lafite and before 98 La Mission Haut Brion. Stable and balanced as a Margaux should be. Slightly light on nose and taste when compared with the 99 Latour and 98 Haut Brion.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment