Roses, cherries, and floral aromatics. The palate wasn’t very interesting, indeed didn’t show the typical charm from DRCs. I doubt about the authenticity of this bottle.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Tasted blind, this wine had a medium red center with light red/orange rims. The medium+ intensity nose of roses, cherries, rhubarb, and tan spices was immediately attractive.
On first pour, the mouth was not. It was disjointed with rough tannin and odd acidity. This wine scored around 90 pts when first poured. However, after a couple hours of air this wine made a major turn-around to show much more fruit, rounded tannin, and more linear acidity.
There was no mistaking this for a 1990 but it was attractive and started living up to the promise of the nose after a few hours in a decanter. This appears to be just coming into its zone so it should drink well for 10-15 years.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
From Methuselah. Fairly clean, floral plus sous bois aromatics. Hard to describe but the palate is scratchy, not offering enough sweetness or balance to really charm. (28/12163)
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
(Domaine de la Romanée-Conti Grands-Echezeaux) Very bricked, cloudy, medium red color with pale meniscus; mature, strawberry, raspberry, truffle nose; mature, dried cherry, raspberry, baking spice, mineral palate; medium finish
(DRC Grands Echezeaux) This had a stunning nose out of the gates. Smoke, charcoal, exotic spice, layers of red fruits on the nose but was insanely tight on the palate. Great concentration but definetly had that '88 thing going on. High acid, big tannins and very austere. Just went downhill from there. Getting very metallic and the structure just taking over till the fruit was just sour. Not great. Anybody had better experiences with this bottle.
NOTE: Some content is property of Burghound and View From the Cellar and RJonWine.com and Rockss and Fruit.
3/8/2024 - shifter wrote: flawed
DRC Montrachet Vertical: All brett. Undrinkable.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
1/15/2024 - Just4fun-AL wrote:
Roses, cherries, and floral aromatics. The palate wasn’t very interesting, indeed didn’t show the typical charm from DRCs. I doubt about the authenticity of this bottle.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
1/15/2024 - Burgnick wrote:
Four-squared and rustic without any typical DRC sensation.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
2/20/2023 - fclarity wrote: 95 Points
Tasted blind, this wine had a medium red center with light red/orange rims. The medium+ intensity nose of roses, cherries, rhubarb, and tan spices was immediately attractive.
On first pour, the mouth was not. It was disjointed with rough tannin and odd acidity. This wine scored around 90 pts when first poured. However, after a couple hours of air this wine made a major turn-around to show much more fruit, rounded tannin, and more linear acidity.
There was no mistaking this for a 1990 but it was attractive and started living up to the promise of the nose after a few hours in a decanter. This appears to be just coming into its zone so it should drink well for 10-15 years.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
9/22/2022 - fcxj wrote: 90 Points
From Methuselah. Fairly clean, floral plus sous bois aromatics. Hard to describe but the palate is scratchy, not offering enough sweetness or balance to really charm. (28/12163)
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment